Understanding Islam: The Battle of Badr

Against the odds, Muhammad's outnumbered force defeated Mecca's army, leading to the rise of Islam, Islamic militancy, and groups like ISIS.

"Battle of Badr" by Unknown - http://warfare.uphero.com/Persia/13-14C/Jami_al-Tawarikh-Mohammed_exhorting_his_family_before_the_battle_of_Badr-Khalili-Ms727-f66a.htm. Licensed under Public Domain via Wikimedia Commons - http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Battle_of_Badr.jpg#/media/File:Battle_of_Badr.jpg

CHARLOTTE, N.C., June 8, 2015 — As Ramadan approaches, let’s remember a major event that occurred when Islam was only in its second year as an organized religion.

The Battle of Badr was a turning point for Islam; had the outcome been different, Islamic extremism as we know it in the 21st century probably would not exist.

The battle was fought on Saturday, March 13, in the year 624, two years after the Prophet Muhammad left his home in Mecca and established Islam in Medina.

Muhammad and many of his followers were members of the powerful Quraysh tribe in Mecca. When they undertook the hijrah and left their tribe behind, it was a significant event for that time. Mecca was one of the richest and most dominant cities in Arabia during the period of Muhammad’s ascent to power.

Understanding Islam: A brief explanation of the unclear Koran

Tensions arose between Mecca and Medina almost immediately after Muhammad’s departure from his home city. By 623 there were already armed hostilities when the Muslims began raiding caravans en route to Mecca.

Raiding and looting caravans was practically a national pastime in the desert wilderness of Arabia in the early 7th century.

Medina was situated very near the Meccan trade route, which put the Muslims in a strong position for their raiding activities, which were also designed to wreak economic havoc on Mecca.

The Muslim army, which numbered only 313 men plus 70 camels and two horses, was about a third the size of the Meccan army of about 1,000 men. As the Muslims neared Badr in preparation for battle, early sources indicate that though the raid had been planned, no serious fighting was expected.

Ramadan was and is the high holy month for Islam; according to the Quran, it is supposed to be a time for fasting and personal introspection. History shows that more often than not, the opposite is true—Muslims use the opportunity to take advantage of the vulnerability of those observing the Ramadan traditions.

According to records from the day, the battle began when three champions from each army came forward to engage in combat. The Muslim trio quickly killed all three of their opponents, indicating to them that their chances for victory were better than they initially expected, despite being outnumbered.


Understanding Islam: Muhammad, merely a mortal, not divine

When the actual battle ensued, the Meccans lacked enthusiasm for the fight and quickly fled. The entire battle was over by early afternoon, after only a few hours.

The significance of the victory for Muhammad was immeasurable. Not only did it elevate the prophet from an outcast to a major Arabian leader virtually overnight, it established Islam as a credible full-fledged religion, which has continued for 1,400 years.

The victory was interpreted as a sign from Allah that the Muslims were divinely inspired as the chosen army. The Battle of Badr is one of the few conflicts—there were more than 80 during Muhammad’s lifetime—that are recorded in the Quran, which has numerous references to this victory.

In addition to Muhammad, the other key beneficiary was a man named Abu Sufyan, who, due to the deaths of several tribal leaders, became the chief of the Quraysh almost by default.

Six years after the Battle of Badr, Muhammad’s army marched into Mecca and negotiated a peaceful surrender of the city with Abu Sufyan. In the process Sufyan emerged as a high-ranking Muslim official.

In the aftermath of the Battle of Badr, two important Meccan captives were beheaded. That precedent alone is enough to inspire the likes of ISIS today.

Understanding Islam: A religion born in violence

So important to Islam is the Battle of Badr that Egypt’s 1973 offensive in the Yom Kippur War was called “Operation Badr.” In the Iranian offensive against Iraq in the late 198os the operations were also named after Badr. In addition, as with the chosen date of 9/11, the date of the assault on Tripoli in 2011 was the 20th of Ramadan, which happened to be the anniversary of the Battle of Badr.

Had Muhammad and his outmanned army been defeated in the second year of Islam’s 14-century history, the Twin Towers of New York might still be standing, an American president would not be making apologies for a hate-based religion and the world would most certainly be more peaceful.

Bob Taylor has been traveling the world for more than 30 years as a writer and award-winning television producer focusing on international events, people and cultures around the globe. Taylor is founder of The Magellan Travel Club (www.MagellanTravelClub.com)

Read more of What in the World and Bob Taylor at Communities Digital News. Follow Bob on Twitter @MrPeabod.

Click here for reuse options!
Copyright 2015 Communities Digital News

• The views expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of the editors or management of Communities Digital News.

This article is the copyrighted property of the writer and Communities Digital News, LLC. Written permission must be obtained before reprint in online or print media. REPRINTING CONTENT WITHOUT PERMISSION AND/OR PAYMENT IS THEFT AND PUNISHABLE BY LAW.

Correspondingly, Communities Digital News, LLC uses its best efforts to operate in accordance with the Fair Use Doctrine under US Copyright Law and always tries to provide proper attribution. If you have reason to believe that any written material or image has been innocently infringed, please bring it to the immediate attention of CDN via the e-mail address or phone number listed on the Contact page so that it can be resolved expeditiously.

  • Uzoozy

    The usual biased story with no head or tail.
    Everyone is an expert.

  • Salman Hyder

    Frankly, the whole article is not according to the historical facts, appears as clearly, the writer is trying hard to collect and manipulate facts to prove somehow the evil severity of Islam. Any well versed Historian will throw it at his face in no second.