EPA standards: Trump vs. Auto Makers vs. California
BUFFALO, NY — EPA standards: Trump vs. Auto Makers vs. California. There is some confusion on why President Trump, the California Air Research Board and automakers are disputing over the upcoming changes in EPA standards (Environmental Protection Agency). The explanation is not political, however, it is important because one state cannot place rules and regulations on the other 49 states.
Automakers, including Ford, signed a letter to President Trump asking him to restore the promised mid-term review of mileage standards that they negotiated with President Barack Obama in 2012. Obama tore up that commitment on his way out the door and declared the original standard of 54.5 miles per gallon by 2024 set in stone. This put a wrench in the future planning for automobiles.
This mid-term review was supposed to examine such things as technology, market conditions, consumer attitudes, impact on employment and profits, safety and other factors. All in an effort to determine whether the CAFE demand was attainable. The current numbers were pulled from thin air by Obama’s regulators, without regard to whether it could be achieved.
Despite the spin from environmentalists and much of the media, the automakers never asked Trump to roll back the EPA standard, but simply to give them what they were promised: a data-driven review.
The administration complied to moving toward a sharply lower target of roughly 37 mpg. It’s an EPA standard automakers can meet without abandoning their highly profitable pickups and sport utility vehicles, without trying to force an artificial market for the electric vehicles that California demands, but consumers don’t want.
Ford and the other automakers are worried that California would march into court the minute the new standards were issued. Asserting its right under a 2006 law to draft its own regulations, setting up a dual automotive market. This concerns environmentalists as they would declare war on them, which will happen anyway.
Automakers concerns were abandoned and four companies accepting California’s arbitrary process designed to bolster the state’s green agenda. It would seem they should prepare to have their worst nightmare of having California regulate emissions and fuel economy standards.
Empowering California is dangerous and will lead to automotive products that have no connection to market demand, and thus slumping sales and job losses.
Mileage and emission standards are not the issue here. The issue, as in so many other areas, is one of control. The private automobile is the issue, for it provides freedom of movement for the masses.
The Answer: The problem with these regulations is how the automakers are responding to them. If 13 states impose laws that increase the cost of the cars, the automakers should charge a $3,000 surcharge on cars sold in those states. Nobody in Wyoming should have to pay extra for a car that ends up subsidizing a car sold in California. If California wants to impose costs on selling a car, only California consumers should pay for it. Not people in states without those regulations.
Watch the full video:
Check out www.laurenfix.com for all of Lauren’s latest content!