WASHINGTON: Showing some True Grit, the President and the American’s that support him will be rousting the Democrats from now until November 2020. As Nadler stomps his mini feet to declare no one is above the law, the President is saying loud and clear we are not going to let Democrats determine the narrative that is America’s future.
In his May 29, 2019 statement, Special Counsel Robert Mueller signals to the Democrats in the House to do what he could not do. In response, The White House Press Secretary, Sarah Huckabee Sanders offers the following:
After a two-year, $35 million investigation that involved 500 witnesses, 500 search warrants, and 2,800 subpoenas, the Special Counsel’s office found no evidence that President Donald J. Trump, any member of his campaign team, or indeed any American citizen conspired with Russia to influence the 2016 presidential election.
So Mueller wants Congressional Democrats to find the President guilty. Of something. Anything. No crime is too great. Or too small. (Robert Mueller Shifts Questions About Trump to Congress).
But…but…but.. Mueller had years, an open purse and dozens of anti-Trump lawyers and investigators and he found nothing. No collusion. In fact, the Trump Administration rejected advancements from Russian agents. Nor did they, if they were truly investigating Russia interference, demand that the Obama administration do something about it. Or provide candidate Trump a defensive briefing of the outlining the interference and investigation.
Furthermore, if Donald Trump, as citizen, candidate or President committed no crime, there can be no obstruction of a crime.
My typing is sometimes wrong but the principle is timeless in the American system. Mueller (note correct spelling) had a two year opportunity to find President Trump (note correct spelling) guilty. He failed in a massive report. Case closed.
— Newt Gingrich (@newtgingrich) May 29, 2019
Of course, if you listen to Mueller closely, he is furthering the paradigm switch from innocent until proven guilty, to the mushy middle ground of “we can’t prove it, but you’re still guilty unless you prove otherwise.”
So now, instead of having our political body focus on health care, prescription drugs (China is Quietly Becoming the World’s Pharmacy — and There Are Big Risks), infrastructure, and immigration, the nabobs are furthering the Hoax that President Trump is somehow guilty of something.
Democrats: Hopeless, hysterical hypochondriacs of history
What Nadler, Clinton, Comey, Swalwell, Schiff, Waters, et al are forgetting is that if Democrats kept their mouths shut, America and the president may have moved forward and let it go. If Pelosi’s addled mind would get a clue, she would have gone to the White House and worked on infrastructure with the President. Not insulted him.
Which begs the questions, where the heck is Chuck Schumer these days?
However, not being too smart, they keep picking at the scab that is the Russian Hoax. Accusing the President of a “coverup”, because the coverup is often worse than the crime, was just grinding salt into the open wound.
Instead of moving forward with legislation as they were hired by America to do. Legislate not investigate.
What Democrats fail to recognize
Democrats are unable to grasp that America is not a collection of dim-witted children. We know what happened. Hillary Clinton led a cabal of rogues within the Department of Justice, FBI, and CIA. All in order to ensure her ascendency to the presidency.
In his May 16 article, writer L.J. Keith says:
“The evidence of a conspiracy to destroy the Trump presidency is overwhelming. So when John Brennan, James Clapper, and Jim Comey are indicted, and they will be, who will they squeal on? After all, the finger pointing and recrimination has already begun. With the indictments of Peter Strzok, Lisa Page and Sally Yates who will they implicate?
At the Obama White House, it is well known that Ben Rhodes, Susan Rice, and Valerie Jarrett were up to their eyeballs in the whole sordid affair. Along with Samantha Powers at the United Nations. Between them, they unmasked Trump associates from NSA wiretaps over 300 times in 2016 alone.
When Ben “Benghazi” Rhodes is indicted, will he finally mention that the whole scheme was run from the Oval Office?
When Susan Rice is frogmarched before a Grand Jury will she confirm that everything was not “run by the book”, but by Obama’s own personal book?
Because it is clear the Constitution was never considered in the entire process.
All the way to the Obama Oval Office
And since the antecedents of spying on Republicans with NSA systems and denial of civil rights go all the way back to 2012, does that mean Eric Holder is back in the criminal mix. Did John Kerry facilitate the spying on Trump associates with British and Australian intelligence? With a James Clapper indictment, will he finally turn on his co-conspirators Brennan and Comey, and his overlords in the Obama Oval Office?
And where is Hillary in the whole process? She is the criminal mastermind of the Steele dossier. How is it that she, Brennan, Clapper, Comey, Kerry, and Lynch came together in this conspiracy and Barrack Obama knew nothing about it.
I was born at night, but I wasn’t born last night.”
President Trump – Fed up and fighting back
Led by President Trump, Americans are demanding that the investigators be investigated. To shine a very bright light on the investigation and the investigators (Trump vows to uncover Russia probe roots with declassification call: ‘We’re exposing everything’)
During one of his nearly daily pressers on the White House lawn, the President announces the release of a prisoner in Turkey (U.S. pastor Andrew Brunson released from prison in Turkey, under house arrest). And amazing job numbers (US economy has added jobs for 103 straight months. Unemployment rate falls to 3.6%). However, reporters can only ask about the Mueller announcement.
A subject that the President would like to move beyond. Not because he is obstructing or covering up anything. But because he has a lot of work to do.
Trump tells reporters that Mueller’s remarks are not different than the report. That it is over. We know Mueller is parsing words in an attempt to goad Nadler’s nabobs into continuing assaults against the President, our political process and you.
A phrase used by Vice President Spiro Agnew to refer to the members of the media. Like Trump he had an acrimonious relationship with the Media.
Said Agnew while speaking to the California Republican state convention on September 11, 1970:
“In the United States today, we have more than our share of the nattering nabobs of negativism. They have formed their own 4-H Club — the ‘hopeless, hysterical hypochondriacs of history.’”
While the phrase is generally attributed to Agnew, it was actually written by White House speechwriter William Safire.
“The words that William Safire penned and that Spiro Agnew mouthed actually had enormous impact that has lasted until this day. They helped foster among conservatives and the folks that Nixon called ‘the silent majority’ growing mistrust of the mainstream media, a mistrust that grew over two generations into a form of hatred.”
“It also started a dangerous spiral of events — journalists started bending backward to kowtow to their conservative critics, beginning in the time of Reagan, an ill-advised shift that did not win back a single reader or viewer on the right. Instead, it caused a lot of folks on the left and even the center to wonder why the national media had stopped doing its job, stopped questioning authority.”