Will SCOTUS hijack religious freedom?

HHS's contraception mandate is a bureaucratic rule, not part of Obamacare; with the Little Sisters of the Poor, the Supreme Court will decide whether the rule trumps religious freedom.

Little Sisters of the Poor take religious freedom battle to Supreme Court - Photo credit - Little Sisters of the Poor

WASHINGTON, March 24, 2016 — This week the Supreme Court began to tackle what might be the Obama administration trifecta of legal hot-button issues. It heard arguments in the Little Sisters of the Poor Home for the Aged v. Burwell, a case pitting religious conscience and freedom against the Department of Health and Human Services’ newly-created right to free abortifacients and contraceptives.

The contraception mandate was not part of the Affordable Care Act, but a rule created by HHS to clarify the vague directives of the statute. The Little Sisters are not challenging Obamacare, only the HHS directive.

Turning on American Muslims: A destructive response to terrorism

HHS has already exempted millions of American workers from the contraception mandate, grandfathering existing plans that did not include it. It exempted religious institutions, but narrowly limited the exemption to exclude even religious schools, hospitals and charities that pursued a faith-based mission.

After a public outcry, HHS created an “accommodation” to allow these institutions to file a form explaining a religious objection and detailing extensive information about their insurance plans. HHS would then inform the insurer to provide contraceptive coverage without cost to the employing institution.

The Obama administration argues that the burden on religious liberty of this accommodation is negligible. The Sisters counter that they are still required to participate in the process of providing contraception and abortifacients, even if they are not required to pay for them.

Religious freedom, part of the bedrock of the First Amendment, is on a collision course with the Obama administration. The HHS regulation would effectively strip religious institutions like the Little Sisters of the right not to participate in the provision of birth control.

An adverse decision by the court against the nuns would have wide-reaching impact and could easily affect other religious non-profits, parochial schools, religious-based hospitals and private faith-based universities. Judi Lake, executive director of the American Christian Civil Rights Movement (ACCRM) agrees. She says, “The Little Sisters of the Poor Catholic charity is taking a stand that we totally support. The loss of Christian religious freedom is a dangerous problem not just for them but for all Christians across America.”

With the death of conservative Justice Antonin Scalia, religious freedom could be hijacked and the nuns could face a 4-4 split decision. This would leave the current Obama provision intact. It is also possible that Chief Justice John Roberts could hold over a decision on the case until another justice is confirmed by the Senate.

Fox News reports that the justices had sharp ideological differences over the administrative as well as the moral and legal implications of the HHS rule.

Department of Justice indicts seven Iranian hackers

During oral arguments, liberal Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg objected to the charity’s claim of violated religious freedom if the law is upheld. She stressed that if the court creates an exception for the nuns, it could open the “floodgates” that would make Obamacare unworkable.

Ginsberg, never a friend of religious liberty protections, was countered by Chief Justice Roberts, who seemed to stand with the Little Sisters. He stressed that the nuns have used “the phrase ‘hijacking,’ and it seems to me that that’s an accurate description of what the government wants to do.” He added, “They want to use the mechanism that the Little Sisters and the other petitioners have set up to provide services because they want the coverage to be seamless.”

The rule was blocked temporarily by the Supreme Court in January 2014, when the court issued a temporary order preventing the administration from enforcing the mandate.  The administration then crafted its compromise. Yet the central issue remains, and the nuns cannot and will not agree to it: This is really no compromise. The nuns won’t be party to providing contraception.

Their religious freedom to oppose abortion and not be party to it is at risk. If the court rules against them, they may face millions of dollars in fines imposed by the Obama administration.

The nuns are guided by the much higher calling to their faith that is found in Isaiah 6:8: “Then I heard the voice of the Lord saying, “Whom shall I send? And who will go for us?” And I said, “Here am I. Send me!”

The nuns have been strengthened by their calling. It is now up to the Supreme Court to decide whether to preserve religious liberty or to sacrifice it to bureaucratic rule-making.

Click here for reuse options!
Copyright 2016 Communities Digital News

• The views expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of the editors or management of Communities Digital News.

This article is the copyrighted property of the writer and Communities Digital News, LLC. Written permission must be obtained before reprint in online or print media. REPRINTING CONTENT WITHOUT PERMISSION AND/OR PAYMENT IS THEFT AND PUNISHABLE BY LAW.

Correspondingly, Communities Digital News, LLC uses its best efforts to operate in accordance with the Fair Use Doctrine under US Copyright Law and always tries to provide proper attribution. If you have reason to believe that any written material or image has been innocently infringed, please bring it to the immediate attention of CDN via the e-mail address or phone number listed on the Contact page so that it can be resolved expeditiously.

Previous articleWhat Utah tells us about the 2016 Presidential Race
Next articleMemphis VA improperly disposes of bio-Hazardous waste
Kevin Fobbs
Kevin Fobbs began writing professionally in 1975. He has been published in the "New York Times," and has written for the "Detroit News," "Michigan Chronicle," “GOPUSA,” "Soul Source" and "Writers Digest" magazines as well as the Ann Arbor and Cleveland "Examiner," "Free Patriot," "Conservatives4 Palin" and "Positively Republican." The former daily host of The Kevin Fobbs Show on conservative News Talk WDTK - 1400 AM in Detroit, he is also a published author. His Christian children’s book, “Is There a Lion in My Kitchen,” hit bookstores in 2014. He writes for Communities Digital News, and his weekly show "Standing at Freedom’s Gate" on Community Digital News Hour tackles the latest national and international issues of freedom, faith and protecting the homeland and heartland of America as well as solutions that are needed. Fobbs also writes for Clash Daily, Renew America and BuzzPo. He covers Second Amendment, Illegal Immigration, Pro-Life, patriotism, terrorism and other domestic and foreign affairs issues. As the former 12-year Community Concerns columnist with The Detroit News, he covered community, family relations, domestic abuse, education, business, government relations, and community and business dispute resolution. Fobbs obtained a political science and journalism degree from Eastern Michigan University in 1978 and attended Wayne State University Law School. He spearheaded and managed state and national campaigns as well as several of President George W. Bush's White House initiatives in areas including Education, Social Security, Welfare Reform, and Faith-Based Initiatives.