OCALA, Fla., June 27, 2014 — Jack Clayton’s 1974 rendition of The Great Gatsby is the quintessential American epic, as well as a sophisticated blockbuster.
While the film is anything but a masterpiece — in fact, it becomes quite disjointed during the end of the second act — the fabled 1920s are recreated to such a stunning extent that the atmosphere alone almost makes up for this.
A breakout performance by Sam Waterston as Nick Carraway, along with an enchanting Jay Gatsby in Robert Redford and highly alluring Jordan Baker portrayed by Lois Chiles, add nicely to the mix. What is really confounding is the sheer emotional output that Gatsby offers to Daisy Buchanan, whose role was badly miscast with Mia Farrow.
For a while, the love is reciprocated, but even in the couple’s most tender moments, it is clear that Gatsby gives far more than he gets in return. This unfortunate fact is noticed early on by Carraway, as anyone who has seen the film or read F. Scott Fitzgerald’s legendary novel — the novel which brought a literary face to the Jazz Age — knows.
Nick straightforwardly tells Jay that his expectations are simply too high for Daisy, who is entangled in an unhappy but socially acceptable marriage, and cannot feasibly expect to repeat the past times in which the war hero-turned-bootlegger and the society woman partook in a youthful romance.
Gatsby, for all of his business and military acumen, appears stunned, only muttering that such a thing is indeed possible. It is this naiveté that really catches one’s attention. In the end, Gatsby pays the ultimate price for his wish to integrate fantasy and reality.
Carraway notes with disgust that Daisy refuses to acknowledge the funeral, much less attend it. Obviously, the lesson here is that looking back to days gone by does no good in the long term.
However, I note something deeper.
The love that Gatsby had for Daisy was of a patently emotionalist nature. There was no reason applied; after all, would a rational individual honestly expend so much time and energy on someone who does not fully appreciate these truly meaningful things?
Not in my book. Carraway comes to the conclusion that it was Gatsby’s decision to operate on feeling rather than thought that killed him.
Perhaps this is the message that ought to be taken away from the story of Jay Gatsby. It should not be applied only to romance, but any other situation in which objective facts have to be weighed, and hard choices made afterward.
Anyone else thinking about this year’s midterm elections, or the next round of presidential primaries? If they don’t fit the bill for Gatsby’s lesson, then nothing does.
While our respective outcomes might not be violent like Gatsby’s — we should hope — placing emphasis on mind over matter will take anyone willing to do so a long way.
If nothing else, it sure beats the alternative.Click here for reuse options!
Copyright 2014 Communities Digital News
• The views expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of the editors or management of Communities Digital News.
This article is the copyrighted property of the writer and Communities Digital News, LLC. Written permission must be obtained before reprint in online or print media. REPRINTING CONTENT WITHOUT PERMISSION AND/OR PAYMENT IS THEFT AND PUNISHABLE BY LAW.
Correspondingly, Communities Digital News, LLC uses its best efforts to operate in accordance with the Fair Use Doctrine under US Copyright Law and always tries to provide proper attribution. If you have reason to believe that any written material or image has been innocently infringed, please bring it to the immediate attention of CDN via the e-mail address or phone number listed on the Contact page so that it can be resolved expeditiously.