Tony Blair has an important new focus about radical Islam

7
1252

CHARLOTTE, NC, April 29, 2014 – The former prime minister of Great Britain, Tony Blair, has had an epiphany. It may be a little late, but it is a hugely welcome realization by a noteworthy politician that the world has a major problem with Islam.

Speaking out about radical Islam in a speech last week at Bloomberg’s London office and again on Sunday on “Meet the Press” hosted by David Gregory, Blair has finally come around to the idea that Islam, not the West, is the problem. That is a 180-degree reversal of his ideas back when the U.S. and Great Britain were drudging up support against Iraq and Saddam Hussein.

Gregory, on the other hand, displayed his ignorance of the situation by spouting the standard media position that it was the invasion of Iraq back in 2003 that is partly responsible for the increase in global terrorism.

“Isn’t the legacy of your leadership, and that of President Bush, in part responsible for the reality today?” asked Gregory, using the uninformed idea that Western intervention in Iraq somehow increased the hatred of Islamists around the world.



READ ALSO: IRS Scandal heats up with Clinton and Islamic ties


Mr. Gregory has apparently forgotten that the World Trade Center was attacked in the mid-90s and again in 2001. Both events preceded the invasion of Iraq, not to mention other incidents such as the USS Cole and Khobar Towers to mention two.

The error in Gregory’s analysis lies in the fact that hatred is hatred which pervades Islam as a core belief in the religion. It is not possible for Islamic radicals to hate any more than they already do or to be further incited by individual actions. Jihad is an instrumental feature of Islam and the goal of Muslim dominance in the world will exist regardless of what the infidels do or do not do. The only catalyst is Islam itself.

While it is true that both Blair and Bush were extremely careful with their words to state specifically that “we are not at war with Islam.” That was not true then, nor is it true now, but, that said, Blair has seemingly, and refreshingly, changed his mind.

With typical British restraint, Blair adamantly responded to Gregory saying, “It’s not coming from us. It’s coming from this ideology, and we aren’t going to defeat it until we liberate ourselves from the attitude that somehow we’re the cause of it.”


READ ALSO: Why Obama’s victory laps may cost democrats in November


Writing for Breitbart News, James Delingpole was among the first to recognize Blair’s change of tone citing two important examples by the ex-prime minister. First, discussing Western commentators, such as Gregory, Blair said at Bloomberg, “They go to extraordinary lengths to say why, in every individual case, there are multiple reasons for understanding that this is not really about Islam, it is not really about religion; there are local or historic reasons which explain what is happening. There is a wish to eliminate the obvious common factor in a way that is almost willful.”

“The second thing,” Blair added, “is that there is a deep desire to separate the political ideology represented by groups such as the Muslim Brotherhood from the actions of extremists including acts of terrorism. This stems from a completely laudable sense that we must always distinguish between those who violate the law and those we simply disagree with.”

To which Delingpole endorsed Blair’s words. “How true! How brave! How totally unlike the politically correct pabulum we’re fed by most politicians! (And how very unlike, for example, Barack Obama’s infamous capitulation speech in Cairo a few years back).”

Still defending his newfound position to David Gregory, Blair noted that, “If it were the case, for example, that the reason why they were engaged in terrorism in Iraq was because of the presence of American troops or British troops, you would expect when we got out, the terrorism would stop. It doesn’t. And it doesn’t because it’s not coming from us.”

Tony Blair’s candor is rare among major political figures today. It is refreshing that someone of his stature has at long last realized the true nature of the enemy we face with Islam.

Let us sincerely hope that other world leaders are paying attention and will follow suit.

Bob Taylor has been traveling the world for more than 30 years as a writer and award winning television producer focusing on international events, people and cultures around the globe. Taylor is founder of The Magellan Travel Club (www.MagellanTravelClub.com).

Read more of What in the World and Bob Taylor at Communities Digital News

Follow Bob on Twitter @MrPeabod

Click here for reuse options!
Copyright 2014 Communities Digital News

• The views expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of the editors or management of Communities Digital News.

This article is the copyrighted property of the writer and Communities Digital News, LLC. Written permission must be obtained before reprint in online or print media. REPRINTING CONTENT WITHOUT PERMISSION AND/OR PAYMENT IS THEFT AND PUNISHABLE BY LAW.

Correspondingly, Communities Digital News, LLC uses its best efforts to operate in accordance with the Fair Use Doctrine under US Copyright Law and always tries to provide proper attribution. If you have reason to believe that any written material or image has been innocently infringed, please bring it to the immediate attention of CDN via the e-mail address or phone number listed on the Contact page so that it can be resolved expeditiously.

  • elizabeth burgess

    It has “everything” to do with Islam. Our government is so afraid of being “politically correct.” Well, I’m not. Islam kills, and Islam is in the United States of America, idolized by our president. Why do you think they are here ???

  • Randy Lowery

    I THINK COUNTRIES SHOULD START DEPORTING THEM BACK TO WHERE THEY CAME FROM.

  • Sandra Leigh Olson Rogers

    Islam is Satan’s “religion/cult” that exposes Satan’s complete envy & jealousy of Almighty God. In Satan’s desire to be exalted above Almighty God, Jesus, & the Holy Spirit (or Holy Ghost as some know Him) Satan created a counterfeit “religion” & named it “I Satan-Lucifer Am”, a/k/a ISLAM, a hateful & violent cult disguised by Satan as a quote, “peaceful religion”, calling for its adherents to lie, cheat, steal, sexually molest little girls, behead any one who doesn’t believe in their Allah, who is NOTHING like Almight God, Jesus, & the Holy Spirit, sodomize, torture, cut off genitalia of homosexuals, “infidels”.

    There is no such thing as a “moderent” Muslim Islamist. More & more cities worldwide that have allowed these vermin to immigrate into their countries (trying to be “tolerant of diversity”) are now sorry they did & are trying to find a way to get rid of these killer cult members, who also rape children, adults, & elderly men & women/boys & girls.

    The only way to be rid of this accursed cult/sect/religion is to exterminate them before they execute you/us!!!!

  • Saying that US and UK in Afghanistan created more terrorists lends credence to the idiocy that believes if we did nothing radical Islam and Al Queda would voluntarily decrease its numbers and believers.
    If we stop busting criminals, crime will decrease ?
    Good grief !

  • thinkingabovemypaygrade

    Quote”… Mr. Gregory has apparently forgotten that the World Trade Center was attacked in the mid-90s and again in 2001. Both events preceded the invasion of Iraq, not to mention other incidents such as the USS Cole and Khobar Towers to mention two. [of various terrorist attacks] …”

  • matchless58

    Having lived in the middle east (one of the most extremely islamic) in the late 1960’s, I could have told you at thiat time what I saw as a trend which ultimately led to what we are experiencing worldwide today. Radical islam has been in the works some 40 years before Bush if not all the way back to 1948.

    • duvenstedter

      How about the Muslim Brotherhood founded in Egypt in 1928 by Hassan al-Banna? In December 1948, the Egyptian Prime Minister, Mahmoud Fahmi an Nukrashi Pasha, was assassinated by a member of the MB, because the PM had outlawed the MB. This means that by 1948, the MB was already a powerful enough threat to the government to be worth outlawing. It was also powerful enough to take revenge (as judged by Middle Eastern values). Even though the assassination was by a rogue member of MB and was condemned by al-Banna, Middle Eastern eyes would have seen it as an attack on behalf the MB. Even a fatal auto accident would have been seen as evidence that the PM had tempted fate. (Al-Banna knew that, because of these perceptions, the PM’s death required his own counter-assassination, which duly occurred.)
      The assassination was even a suicide mission, although the assassin did not kill himself. The assassination was inside a building, so the assassin knew he had no chance of escape. He knew that, if he were lucky, he would be gunned down immediately. If he were not lucky, he would be arrested and hung, but only after hideous and prolonged torture. (In the event, he was not lucky.) Long before the rise of modern Muslim fundamentalism, such suicidal attacks, carried out in full view of guards and even of the public, were a long tradition, established by the Order of the Assassins (before 1080 AD to as late as the early 14th century).