LOS ANGELES, April 17, 2014 — American liberals have turned on one of their own. In a delicious irony, one of the judges who upheld the constitutionality of Obamacare, including the ushering out of the elderly via bureaucratic “death panels” may become one of its most famous victims.
Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg has been a champion of liberal causes during her time on the bench. A former ACLU lawyer, Ginsburg faithfully toes the liberal line. She has even said that she consults international legal documents beyond the United States Constitution when considering her rulings.
Her reward for being a lifelong leftist is the death sentence being placed on her career by her leftist friends. A death sentence based on nothing more than her age and life line.
New Republic writes:
And, of course, she has been a Supreme Court justice for more than 20 years, only the second woman on the highest court, where she has been a stalwart liberal vote. A few months ago, she became the first justice to officiate a same-sex marriage. Evidence early this year from her dissent in a case that ended up neutering the Voting Rights Act suggests that, at 80, she’s still got it: “Just as buildings in California have a greater need to be earthquake proofed, places where there is greater racial polarization in voting have a greater need for prophylactic measures to prevent purposeful race discrimination,” she noted
So it pains me to say the following things. First: she is dead wrong about something big. And the big thing she is wrong about is insisting that she should not consider retiring soon, while she knows that a Democratic president and a Democratic-leaning Senate will be in-charge of replacing her. Which brings us to the second thing: she should retire soon.
The left is playing a strategic game: They want to force Ginsburg into retirement from the federal bench. Ginsburg is elderly and not in the best of health. If she retires now, President Obama will nominate a nominee every bit as ideologically leftist as Ginsburg. But one far younger.
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid can force that nominee through on a straight party-line vote due to his abolishing the filibuster. If Ginsburg waits until after the 2014 elections, Republican control of the Senate could force Obama to pick a nominee slightly to the right of Trotsky.
If Republicans win the White House in 2016, Ginsburg’s replacement will be a Republican.
From a liberal point of view, the strategy makes sense. The problem for the left is that Ginsburg does not want to retire. We can assume that she enjoys the dignity that comes with working and earning a paycheck, because many people do enjoy that validity.
Liberals will claim that their thinking is bipartisan. After all, conservatives would pressure an elderly conservative justice to retire if a Republican were president.
What liberals fail to understand is that conservatives value human life. We are not willing to get rid of our precious human capital just to score political points.
For many liberals, Ginsburg is just a replaceable part, a cog in a machine, a means to an end. Winning at all costs sacrifices the very humanity of mere expendables. People are reduced to chessboard pawns, even powerful ones on the Supreme Court.
Conservatives intensely dislike most of Ginsburg’s rulings. Her legal reasoning is frequently at odds with the Constitution she is supposed to faithfully uphold. She is an activist judge who legislates from the bench, with destructive results.
Most conservatives would love to see her leave the bench. They are just not willing to corrupt their souls by throwing momma from the train.
Decent human beings understand this. And Justic Stephen Breyer, aged 75 — be careful. You’re next.