Smearing Brett Kavanaugh: NYT, Harris, and Booker live in glass houses
WASHINGTON, DC: The New York Times renewed the Brett Kavanaugh smear campaign with claims of decades old sexual misconduct at Yale. Senator Kamala Harris immediately, and predictably, called for Kavanaugh’s impeachment. One year after the spectacle of his confirmation hearings the Democrat smear merchants and their partners in the media, are gearing up the calculated smear machine. Ready to provide another round of unprovable claims.
Apparently Democrats are even less informed about the rule of law now than they were a year ago.
Smearing Brett Kavanaugh for sport
The NYT article focuses on a classmate at Yale named Deborah Ramirez. Ramirez claims Kavanaugh thrust his penis in her face at a drunken dorm party. Another classmate, Max Stier, claims Kavanaugh dropped his pants at another party and put his penis in another women’s hand.
The problem is that Deborah Ramirez, by her own account, cannot accurately remember the events of that night. Neither can the women in the 2nd incident. Events from 40 years ago, were not reported at the time to any authorities.
Just like Christine Blasey Ford, the accusers are hardly innocent bystanders. (Max Stier: 5 Fast Facts You Need to Know)
Yet the corpse has been dug up. The smear revived. And a sitting Justice of the Supreme Court is subject to another round of lies and character assassination. Without even the most basic respect for the rule of law and the concept of “innocent until proven guilty”.
Democrats destroying “due process” and the “presumption of innocence”
Kavanaugh’s attackers have reversed the rule of law so that he is guilty until proven innocent. The provably false accusations of Ford and super lawyer Michael Avenatti are a dark chapter for our politics. Democrats with questionable facts in their past should be careful before throwing stones when they live in fragile glass houses of their own.
Christine Blasey Ford was not only a liar. She should be prosecuted for the charade she staged in our nation’s Capital. Her lawyer recently admitted that Ford came forward in order to stop Kavanaugh from being the 5th vote against Roe V Wade. She all but admitted that it was a political hoax.
Where is accountability?
Christine Blasey Ford: A fraud on the public
Ford’s classmates from high school depict her as a somewhat loose boy crazy young woman who drank a lot at parties. When Ford claimed that she had only one beer at the alleged party with Kavanaugh, one of her classmates remarked that if she only had one beer, it was the first time she only had one beer at a party.
Ford received almost a million dollars from her Go Fund Me account.
Though she was not a credible witness. The entire story of her coming forward and Senator Feinstein’s role in it was never seriously investigated. Kavanaugh was set up and intentionally smeared using standards that wouldn’t be valid in a kangaroo court.
A point to remember is that Brett Kavanaugh’s Go Fund Me account raised large sums as well. However, unlike Blasey Ford, the money was donated to charities. Blasey Ford became a millionaire.
Kamala Harris and Willie Brown
So when Kamala Harris says the Kavanaugh should be impeached, she echoes the despicable behavior she showed during the confirmation hearings. However, Harris should be careful about her own past. A past that is riddled with sexual misconduct, starting with her affair with then-married California Assembly Speaker Willie Brown.
Harris and Brown carried on their affair for years. He appointed her to two State boards that required minimal work but paid her over $120,000 a year. It is difficult to imagine a scenario where that would be considered ethical.
Willie Brown Admits To Sexual Affair w/Kamala Harris, Boosted Her Career
Is there a Willie Brown/Kamala Harris sex tape?
So applying the Brett Kavanaugh standard to Kamala Harris would require we ask Kamala Harris some pointed questions. Did Kamala Harris and Willie Brown ever make a sex tape? Was sex in the state capital, say, on Willie Brown’s desk, or in his office, a thing?
Did they ever bring a third wheel into their bedroom?
Because, by Brett Kavanaugh standards, we can assume the sex tape exists.
We can assume they had sex in the state capital. Can we assume they had sex in Willie Brown’s office? It is known that Harris didn’t give a damn about Willie Brown’s wife. Much less the open perception that she was his mistress.
So again, I would ask Kamala Harris where the sex tape is? How many sex tapes did you make? How many times did you have sex in Willie Brown’s office?
If you can ask a Supreme Court Justice outlandish questions about a roundly discredited, allegation, Ms. Harris, then I reserve the right to demand a response from you.
“Spartacus” Cory Booker: Secrets and hypocrisy
Then there is Cory Booker, our man Spartacus. The unmarried Booker was discreetly accused by a gay man last year of following him into a bathroom in Newark and making unwanted sexual advances on him.
A gay man compliments @CoryBooker. Booker allegedly follows him to the bathroom, aggressively approaching him for oral sex— in a stall. The man declines and escapes. He also claims to have more proof than accusers like Christine Blasey Ford.
I think we should listen to him.
— Richard Armande Mills (RAM) (@RAMRANTS) October 20, 2018/blockquote> ;
Bookers accuser was black man, and a Democrat, but what did we hear from the news media. Crickets.
Now Booker’s sexuality is none of my business, but his hypocrisy is.
Several months ago he attempted to push a beard into the pubic eye, proclaiming his affection for Rosie Perez. Well, no one is buying it. And if Spartacus is going to make reckless accusations of sexual misconduct with the clear intent of smearing man and destroying his life, then he should be held to the same standards.
Brett Kavanaugh’s high school and college life were 40 years ago. Cory Booker was accused last year. Kamala Harris was an adult with a law degree when she was carrying on with Willie Brown.
And then there is the New York Times.
The ugly truth about the New York Times
The “paper of record”, the “old grey lady”, has become an open sewer of partisan attacks against the President. And any of his perceived “allies”. After perpetuating the Russia Hoax for three years, serving as a conduit for leaks from Brennan, Clapper, and Comey, the New York Times has no credibility left. Their attacks on Kavanaugh are the highest form of yellow journalism.
They promote neither truth nor decency but wallow in openly partisan political attacks unworthy of their esteemed history. They are the leading member of the Democrat Party Press, as Mark Levin calls them. Along with their fellow smear merchants at the Washington Post, CNN, and MSNBC.
The echo chamber of the smear merchants
As we speak this latest calumny against Justice Kavanaugh is spreading through the echo chamber of the left-wing media. Democrat Presidential candidates are calling for his impeachment. A year after the most despicable confirmation hearings imaginable, they are resurrecting yet another smear against Kavanaugh without regard for truth, due process, or decency.
Kamala Harris and Cory Booker and the rest of the Democrat smear merchants had better be prepared to have the same standards applied to them. The New York Times should be apologizing to Brett Kavanaugh, not smearing him. If this is the standard by which people can be destroyed, then what is good for the goose is good for the gander.
Where is the Kamala Harris/Willie Brown sex tape, and how many of them are there?