Michael Brown wasn’t killed by white supremacy

Rioter and looter after shooting of Michael Brown

OCALA, Fla., August 18, 2014 — The Saturday before last, Michael Brown swiped several cigars from a convenience store counter, passing much of his spoils to friend Dorian Johnson.

At first, the far older clerk was distracted. He picked up on the theft, though, and rushed to the customers’ aisle where Brown and Johnson were beginning their exit. This clerk had a small frame, and Brown was over six feet tall.

In spite of that, the clerk managed to cut ahead of Brown and block the front door. With a single hand, Brown pushed him away, and the man landed against a rack of snack foods. Undeterred, the clerk pressed forward, trying to grab Brown’s cigars.

READ ALSO: Meet Darren Wilson, officer in Michael Brown shooting

Brown turned to face him, and menacingly backed the clerk away from the door. As the thieves left, the man pointed at both and followed them to the entrance.

Just minutes later, Brown and Johnson were walking in the middle of a street. A police car pulled up and ordered them to step onto the sidewalk. It is said that Officer Darren Wilson saw the cigars in Brown’s hands and suspected him of robbing the store.

According to Wilson’s department, the following took place: Brown refused to move off of the street. Wilson then opened his door, though Brown prevented him from completely doing so. The 18-year-old rushed Wilson; leaping inside of the vehicle where a fight ensued. At some point, Wilson’s gun was fired. Brown not only struck Wilson, but reached for his pistol. Wilson eventually got a firm grip on his firearm and shot Brown, who was by this time outside of the car.

Today, Brown is revered by untold millions as a civil rights icon.

Such an odd development is explained not by Brown himself, but the context of his death. His shooting took place in the St. Louis suburb of Ferguson. He was black and Wilson is white. The city of about 21,000 has been subject to rapidly changing demographics. In 1990, Ferguson was almost 74 percent white. In 2010, it was roughly 67 percent black and just over 29 percent white.

Nonetheless, all but one of Ferguson’s city councilors are white, along with its police chief and Republican mayor. This can be explained by abysmally low voter turnout in municipal elections. It’s probably safe to say that most who vote are longtime residents whose political views lean more conservative than those of newer arrivals.

The Ferguson P.D. has 53 members, only three of whom are black. Chief Thomas Jackson, a reformer brought on in recent years, aggressively pursued workforce diversity. Despite his efforts, progress has been elusive.

No shortage of perpetually aggrieved and outraged activists have drawn the conclusion that Ferguson is trapped in a vortex of white supremacy. They claim that Brown’s death is but the latest chapter, and Ferguson’s state of affairs is mirrored by America as a whole. Generally speaking, these folks are more interested in racial minority politics than what led to Brown being shot.

READ ALSO: Brownfeld: Do Blacks share responsibility for America’s racist society?

As with George Zimmerman from early 2012 to mid-2013, Darren Wilson is the newest target of their pent-up rage. Victimhood narratives, regardless of their factuality, give otherwise shifty, malcontented people a reason for existence.

Of course, Ferguson police do stop blacks at higher rates than whites, which for some is ironclad proof of law enforcement racism. As data from St. Louis show, however, that is simply not true.

The Metropolitan Police Department’s 2012 community report revealed something stark. Blacks account for 77.5 percent of all arrests; including 97.6 percent for murder, 78.6 percent for forcible rape, 91.8 percent for robbery, 84.7 percent for aggravated assault, 80 percent for burglary, 81.4 percent for auto theft, and 71.8 percent for arson.

For most who clog Ferguson’s streets in protest, and a great deal of those who lend support from afar, the reality that they are opposing a mythical construct is unimportant. Those who destroyed businesses and violated the state-imposed curfew are out to cause trouble — pure and simple.

Don’t rationalize their collective fury with fantasies of white oppression. Miserable people have manipulated a tragic event with the goal of spreading hatred and/or making money.

That is truly sad.


Is America too far gone for another Greatest Generation?

Aaron Clarey, economist, author, and popular blogger, talks about America’s decline on the latest Cotto & Company

Click here for reuse options!
Copyright 2014 Communities Digital News

• The views expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of the editors or management of Communities Digital News.

This article is the copyrighted property of the writer and Communities Digital News, LLC. Written permission must be obtained before reprint in online or print media. REPRINTING CONTENT WITHOUT PERMISSION AND/OR PAYMENT IS THEFT AND PUNISHABLE BY LAW.

Correspondingly, Communities Digital News, LLC uses its best efforts to operate in accordance with the Fair Use Doctrine under US Copyright Law and always tries to provide proper attribution. If you have reason to believe that any written material or image has been innocently infringed, please bring it to the immediate attention of CDN via the e-mail address or phone number listed on the Contact page so that it can be resolved expeditiously.

  • David


  • Gilsharkey

    Excellent commentary! Here are a couple of things we know.

    1. The “Gentle Giant” was likely facing 5-10 years in prison for strong armed robbery based on the videotape, and likely knew that the moment he walked out of that store.

    2. The robbery- while likely disconnected in a legal sense from the shooting- almost certainly shows the 6’4″ 300 pound “Gentle Giant’s” mindset as he confronted the police officer.

    3. The police officer sustained wounds to the face, although we don’t have all the facts yet. When these facts come to light, they will help us to see this incident in context.

    4. The bullet wounds were in his front, completely contradicting claims that the “Gentle Giant” was running away when he was shot.

    5. It took 6 bullets to drop the “Gentle Giant.” The kill shot was almost certainly the final shot to the head. He was shot four times in the right arm before the last two shots, which were head shots.

    What we don’t know:

    1. How serious was the struggle? Did Brown actually enter the police car and try to grab the officer, in which case deadly force would have been justified?

    2. How far away was the “Gentle Giant” before he was shot? Was he a threat when the officer made the kill shot.

    3. Was the officer truly in danger to his physical safety when he shot the “Gentle Giant” in the right arm? Was he still in danger to his physical safety when he made the kill shot?

    • David Spencer


  • David Spencer

    “Michael Brown wasn’t killed by White Supremacy.” No, he was killed by the ultra militarized Police State that is Mississippi…and Georgia, Tennessee and (Insert-City-Here). If you don’t see that –the militant haircuts, the AR15s, the battlefield rhetoric and SWAT-everywhere approach that has become ubiquitous in modern policing- it’s because you’re trying very hard not to look.

    • pintorider

      The militarization of the police has been going on for quite a few years now, as you probably know. However, this was a single officer in a patrol car with no SWAT equipment or clothing on him. Just a regular patrol.

      The eye witness, his friend, tells a story that makes no sense. And if it doesn’t makes sense, it is probably incorrect. I just wonder why it took so long to bring out the strong arm robbery video. Seems to me, this bolsters the cops’ argument that the shooting was justified.

      And damn, somebody should have placed a covering over the body…