Larry Flynt and Hillary Clinton: the politics and human bondage

1
2746
Pornographer Larry Flynt

WASHINGTON, May 2, 2015 – In an 1819 letter to Judge Spencer Roane, Thomas Jefferson noted the United States Supreme Court’s claim to the exclusive power to decide what is and isn’t constitutional and said, “The Constitution, on this hypothesis, is a mere thing of wax in the hands of the judiciary, which they may twist and shape into any form they may please. It should be remembered, as an axiom of eternal truth in politics, that whatever power in any government is independent, is absolute also… Independence can be trusted nowhere but with the people… They are inherently independent of all but moral law.”

Speaking of “moral law,” reprobate pornographer Larry Flynt offered his support for Hillary Clinton’s run for the Democratic Party’s presidential nomination, though he added, “I don’t think she needs my endorsement.”

Flynt’s Clinton fetish would be of interest to Jefferson. “I take a look at the Supreme Court and I realize that they’ve gradually emerged as a new legislative body because Congress won’t do their job. They [the high court] want to make the rules everybody else lives by… If Hillary gets in, chances are she’s going to have an opportunity to appoint two, maybe three, justices to the court,” Flynt told the website “Bloomberg Politics.”


Read Also: Clinton & Adelson: U.S. Foreign Policy for sale to the highest bidder



President Obama has done his best to circumvent the will of Congress since losing influence in the legislative body after the 2010 and 2014 midterm elections. He issued executive amnesty for millions of illegal aliens because, as Flynt said, “Congress won’t do their job.” Obama added that by acting unilaterally, “At least we can do ours,” using the royal “We.”

As the country continues to collapse, a growing number of Americans are starting to question the authoritarian statism of the Democratic Party, using their votes to express displeasure, as they did last November. That is why the former, forward-thinking Democratic Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid amended his chamber’s filibuster rule, allowing a simple majority vote to confirm Obama’s judicial nominees.

As Flynt honestly admitted, when the will of the people turns against you, use the court’s dictatorial powers to “make the rules everybody else lives by.”

Whether it’s the high court’s Dred Scott ruling that once declared African-Americans non-persons with no standing before any court in the land, or its Roe v. Wade decision declaring the unborn non-persons stripped of their natural right to life or the mandated subjection of a so-called “free people” to the service of one man’s dictatorial and heavily bureaucratized health care monstrosity, the courts have a long and twisted history of trampling upon the individual in favor of state power.

The House of Representatives – the people’s strongest voice in government – is thus rendered superfluous.

At least, that’s what political pornographers Larry Flynt, Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton believe.

Thomas Jefferson said Americans should declare their independence from Great Britain and “assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God entitle them.” That is not a political statement. That is a moral declaration.

Years later, Jefferson insisted that the first obligation of legitimate government is to “declare and enforce only our natural rights and duties, and to take none of them from us. No man has a natural right to commit aggression on the equal rights of another; and this is all from which the laws ought to restrain him.”

In 1798, Congress passed four pieces of legislation called the Alien and Sedition Acts. It said “that if any person shall write, print, utter, or publish… any false, scandalous and malicious writing or writings against the government of the United States, or either House of the Congress of the United States, or the President of the United States, with intent to defame the said government… or to bring them, or either of them, into contempt or disrepute; or to excite against them, or either or any of them, the hatred of the good people of the United States… shall be punished by a fine not exceeding two thousand dollars, and by imprisonment not exceeding two years.”


Read Also: Clinton Cash said to expose Hillary Clinton’s money making machine


The national government’s attack on First Amendment free speech occurred a mere 10 years after the ratification of the U.S. Constitution.

The White House, Congress and the courts were controlled by the Federalist Party, which counted among its luminaries Alexander Hamilton, writer of Federalist #84, which urged the state of New York ratify the Constitution as written and not include a Bill of Rights, because “the people surrender nothing [to the national government], and as they retain everything [individual sovereignty] they have no need of particular reservations [a list of individual rights never to be infringed].”

Hamilton lied.

And the Federalist-appointed justices of the Supreme Court did nothing to overturn the blatantly unconstitutional Alien and Sedition Acts.

A horrified Jefferson offered a remedy to the states. Refute these obnoxious acts of federal overreach by not enforcing them within state boundaries.

In what became known as the Kentucky Resolutions, Jefferson wrote, “Let the honest advocate of confidence read the Alien and Sedition Acts, and say if the Constitution has not been wise in fixing limits to the government it created, and whether we should be wise in destroying those limits. Let him say what the government is, if it be not a tyranny, which the men of our choice have conferred on our President, and the President of our choice has assented to… In questions of power, then, let no more be heard of confidence in man, but bind him down from mischief by the chains of the Constitution.”

Jefferson invoked the Bill of Rights that Hamilton so strenuously argued against, the 10th Amendment in particular, which states, “The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.”

The election of 1800 solved the constitutional crises when Americans ousted Federalists from Congress and put Jefferson in the White House. And the laws allowing the government’s assault on free speech were rescinded.

State legislatures are supposed to provide constitutional resistance to the authoritarian conceits of Washington’s busy bureaucrats, especially those in black robes. The ones pornographer Larry Flynt would like “to make the rules everybody else lives by.”

That may satisfy the twisted, sadomasochistic inclinations of Flynt as regards the corrupt object of his political affections, Hillary Clinton.

Flynt, after all, helped keep the public’s focus on sex during President Bill Clinton’s Senate impeachment trial. It was Flynt who revealed the sexual indiscretions of Bubba’s Republican House prosecutors. Forgotten was the fact that Clinton’s sexual dalliances only became constitutional fodder the instant he lied about them, under oath, before a federal grand jury – a high crime more than a misdemeanor.

Flynt’s endorsement of political dominatrix Hillary speaks to the sick, immoral character of the left’s pornographic twisting of our Constitution into an instrument of sadistic, human bondage.

Click here for reuse options!
Copyright 2015 Communities Digital News

• The views expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of the editors or management of Communities Digital News.

This article is the copyrighted property of the writer and Communities Digital News, LLC. Written permission must be obtained before reprint in online or print media. REPRINTING CONTENT WITHOUT PERMISSION AND/OR PAYMENT IS THEFT AND PUNISHABLE BY LAW.

Correspondingly, Communities Digital News, LLC uses its best efforts to operate in accordance with the Fair Use Doctrine under US Copyright Law and always tries to provide proper attribution. If you have reason to believe that any written material or image has been innocently infringed, please bring it to the immediate attention of CDN via the e-mail address or phone number listed on the Contact page so that it can be resolved expeditiously.