Immigration Reform: President Obama moves away from ‘Deporter in Chief’

3
1108
Source Flickr Author SEIU International

WASHINGTON, April 22, 2014 — The Obama Administration is considering changes to its current deportation policy, which would shield some immigrants from being forced to leave the country.

According to AP, Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson is evaluating whether to limit deportations of illegal immigrants who have lived in the United States for long periods of time and do not have any significant criminal arrests or convictions.

The change is the result of a review ordered by President Barack Obama on how to make deportation policy more humane. Obama, who has championed immigration reform throughout his two-terms in office, has had little success in changing the current laws.

Under Obama, approximately 200,000,000 immigrants have been deported. Of those, approximately 20% were individuals who had committed serious crimes. The remaining 80% were individuals who had committed minor infractions, such as traffic violations, or those with no criminal record of any kind.


The Department of Homeland Security told the press, “Any report of specific considerations at this time would be premature.”

Activists say the proposed changes fall short of true immigration reform and are calling for Obama to take broader steps. Specifically, they are asking the White House to expand a program that grants work permits to certain groups to include parents of any children born in the United States.

Opponents, however, will likely rail against even the possibility of changes to the deportation policies. Republican members of Congress, and some Democrats, have barred major immigration reform.

Senator Ted Cruz (R-Tex) has continually urged against immigration reform, opposing any pathway for citizenship for illegals, and says there should not even be an immigration reform debate until 2015. He almost certainly will attack the President over the proposed changes, again leading a charge against loosening current policies.

There is some hint that immigration reform could still happen this year. Last week, the Wall Street Journal reported that House Speaker John Boehner told a group of donors in Las Vegas he was “hellbent” on passing immigration reform “this year.” However, this contradicts his previous assertions that the House will not even discuss immigration reform until President Obama “can be trusted to enforce our laws.”

The suggestion that the Obama Administration is reconsidering the deportation policy, however, indicates that the President believes Congress will not address immigration reform any time soon. The Administration almost certainly knows that taking unilateral action will further entrench Republicans, making any compromise on the issue unlikely.

Immigration reform remains a hot-button topic and will likely reemerge as the 2016 presidential election nears. Jeb Bush reignited the debate last week, saying that most immigrants who cross the border to find work are not engaged in an act of hostility. Instead, he said, “It’s an act of love; it’s an act of commitment to your family.”

Hillary Clinton has made no secret of her views on immigration reform. Last week in New York, she told a group at the Bill, Hillary and Chelsea Clinton Foundation “No Ceilings” initiative, “I’m a huge supporter of immigration reform and a path to citizenship and will continue to advocate for that.”

A late March CBS News poll shows that 68 percent of respondents say undocumented workers should at least be able to stay in the United States. 56 percent of those respondents say that the immigrants should be allowed to apply for citizenship.

Click here for reuse options!
Copyright 2014 Communities Digital News

• The views expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of the editors or management of Communities Digital News.

This article is the copyrighted property of the writer and Communities Digital News, LLC. Written permission must be obtained before reprint in online or print media. REPRINTING CONTENT WITHOUT PERMISSION AND/OR PAYMENT IS THEFT AND PUNISHABLE BY LAW.

Correspondingly, Communities Digital News, LLC uses its best efforts to operate in accordance with the Fair Use Doctrine under US Copyright Law and always tries to provide proper attribution. If you have reason to believe that any written material or image has been innocently infringed, please bring it to the immediate attention of CDN via the e-mail address or phone number listed on the Contact page so that it can be resolved expeditiously.

Previous articleThe Romantics: In Series’ tribute to Schubert and Goethe
Next articleHas Harry Reid’s filibuster gamble destroyed the Democratic party?
Lisa M. Ruth
Lisa M. Ruth is Editor-in-Chief of CDN. In addition to her editing and leadership duties, she also writes on international events, intelligence, and other topics. She has worked with CDN as a journalist since 2009. Lisa is also President of CTC International Group, Inc., a research and analysis firm in South Florida, providing actionable intelligence to decisionmakers. She started her career at the CIA, where she won several distinguished awards for her service. She holds an MA in international relations from the University of Virginia, and a BA in international relations from George Mason University. She also serves as Chairman of the Board of Horses Healing Hearts, and is involved with several other charitable organizations, including Habitat for Humanity, The Boys and Girls Clubs of America, and AYSO.
  • John Doe

    “Under Obama, approximately 200,000,000 immigrants have been deported.” LOL! That’s almost 2/3 of the country.

  • Charles Edward Brown

    NO AMNESTY. Deport all 12 million illegal aliens.

  • RGZ_50

    a couple of things. The deportation numbers are as legit as Obama’s “8 million new Obamacare signups”. It was disclosed that the bulk of the claimed deportations reported, were not based on internal enforcement, but in actuality, were turn backs at the border.

    I’d also caution with some healthy skepticism, the polls cited. The mass media is trying to generate some Zeitgeist with these polls which have been carefully crafted as the the wording of the question, which pre-determines a set outcome percentage. The bulk of the non ‘push polling’ reflects opinions of American voters of just the opposite viewpoint.