WASHINGTON, April 4, 2016 — Hillary Clinton said flatly on Sunday, “The unborn person doesn’t have constitutional rights.”
The Democratic front-runner reaffirmed her position on abortion when she appeared on NBC’s “Meet the Press.” She suggested that “under our current laws,” those rights that most importantly guarantee “life” should be denied to millions of the unborn.
Her statement is chilling to those who seek to protect unborn children from abortion, but it is also a direct challenge. If they wish to protect the unborn in 2017, Clinton’s phrase, “under our current laws,” must be a clarion call to action at every local, state and national campaign event in 2016.
Roe v Wade and abortion are not a political side issue for conservatives to discard. Clinton has provided ammunition that the eventual GOP presidential candidate can use to to advocate for the unborn.
Clinton is determined to undermine and marginalize the constitutional rights of the unborn. If the unborn are ever recognized as even remotely human and endowed with even the slightest human rights, then the pro-abortion cartel, which has championed over 55 million abortions since 1973, has been a party to mass murder.
It is more convenient for Clinton and the Planned Parenthood abortion industry to keep the focus on phrases like a “woman’s right to choose,” making those words a weapon against the innocent life that has been denied constitutional rights as well as rights given to that unborn baby by God.
The American Christian Civil Rights Movement (ACCRM) opposes Clinton’s cavalier approach to the human and constitutional rights of the unborn child. Judi Lake, executive director, suggests that the Democratic presidential candidate has done the prolife community a tremendous favor. She says, “Hillary has created an opening for anyone on the sidelines who was undecided about the right of the unborn to have any rights. The unborn child is an innocent and that is why our national and international campaign to make the ‘Unborn Person of the Year in 2016’ is so crucial now.”
Lake adds, “The unborn has been largely forgotten in this election year and Hillary has opened the door by dashing any and all rights they have.”
Would President Hillary Clinton leave the slightest opening for the rights of unborn children to be manifest? No. She believes, as President Obama believes, that it is better to support murder in the womb than to inconvenience the mother carrying the unborn baby.
Obama’s marginalization of the unborn child was highlighted during the presidential campaign of 2008. According to Life News Obama stressed in an interview, “I am going to teach them first of all about values and morals. But if they make a mistake, I don’t want them punished with a baby.”
For Obama, the unborn child has no intrinsic value and is little more than a punishment for sexual mistakes.
As president, Hillary would not only carry on Obama’s legacy but double down on it, perhaps adding another cabinet or czar position to let Planned Parenthood oversee the slaughter of the unborn with all deliberate speed.
There is a great silent majority of Americans who have not yet stepped into the public arena in their home towns or even in their churches or community groups to advocate for the unborn.
Hillary says the unborn have no constitutional rights. Tell her that they do by voting to make the ‘Unborn Person of the Year.’ It is easy to take 60 seconds to click the YouTube link to vote for the unborn child and send Hillary the message that America will remain silent no longer. Silence is betrayal.