Election 2014: Predicting the Governors’ races by state


MINNEAPOLIS, October 14, 2014 — While most political pundits are focused on the battle for the United States Senate, the 2014 elections also feature plenty of gubernatorial races. Voter disgust with Washington can bring down unpopular governors, but capable chief executives can buck national trends just as easily.

2014 is shaping up to be a year where plenty of incumbents in both parties could go down in flames. As for the winners, many of them will immediately begin taking steps toward opening presidential exploratory committees.

Despite the tough times and pessimistic national mood in general, several governors in both parties will coast to reelection.


NEW YORK — Andrew Cuomo is not going anywhere. Even a corruption scandal will not taint him. His state is solid blue.

CALIFORNIA — Jerry Brown will eventually lead the Golden State off of a cliff and into bankruptcy, but most voters will not care. Trees, bunny rabbits and gay marriages matter more than businesses fleeing the state. The left owns the state. Brown will coast to reelection.

READ ALSO: 2014 midterm election Senate predictions

VERMONT — Outside of Cuba and Russia, it is hard to find places further to the left than Vermont. Socialists own it and conservatives are content to flee to neighboring states. Peter Shumlin is entrenched.

OREGON — John Kitzhaber is a liberal running a liberal state. His fiancee got caught up in a scandal, which should matter to nobody. He is safe as can be.


ALABAMA — Robert Bentley is a solid Republican in a solidly Republican state in a solidly Republican year.

NEVADA — Brian Sandoval has the best of all possible worlds. He is a likable and respected Hispanic Republican in a state with many Hispanics in a Republican year. He is expected to romp to reelection.

SOUTH DAKOTA — Dennis Daugaard could lose if the ballots somehow leave his name off of them. Barring Armageddon, he will remain in charge for four more years.

WYOMING — Wyoming is very conservative, and Matt Mead is as safe as it gets.

IDAHO — Butch Otter did face some primary opposition, but the Idaho GOP is now firmly united. Revered conservative Congressman Raul Labrador endorsed the more moderate Otter, who should have a cakewalk reelection.

OKLAHOMA — Mary Fallin is smart, capable, liked, respected, and conservative in a conservative state, which works quite well when the national mood swings to the right.

ALASKA — Unlike Sarah Palin, Sean Parnell maintains a low profile. Parnell is an inoffensive, non-controversial guy in a Republican state in a Republican year. With most attention on Alaska’s Senate race, Parnell will stay above the fray and win election.

GEORGIA — Nathan Deal dispatched primary opponents and should be a safe enough bet for reelection. Conservatives have never warmed to him, which only helps him with moderate Democrats.


RHODE ISLAND — Rhode Island actually has a Republican Party, but it is fractured and showing about as much excitement as a test pattern. The left will stay on cruise control here.

MARYLAND — Governor Martin O’Malley is running a quixotic presidential campaign under the illusion that Democrats will support a white male against Hillary, even if he is liberal. Meanwhile, his successor will coast because Maryland has been flooded with federal dollars. They like President Obama and his goodies.

HAWAII — A fascinating primary drama took place when Democrat Governor Abercrombie defied the late Senator Daniel Inuoye’s dying wish that his successor be Colleen Hanabusa. Abercrombe nominated Schatz. Ironically, while Schatz survived his primary against Hanabusa, Abercrombie himself went down. Republicans are talking up Duke Aiona, who lost badly in his last race. Even former Governor Linda Lingle, considered the only electable Republican in Hawaii, was trounced in her Senate run. Until proven otherwise, Democrats own Hawaii.


TEXAS — Republicans nominated Attorney General Greg Abbott, regarded as one of the most decent human beings to ever seek higher office. His Democrat counterpart Wendy Davis is attempting to become one of most terrible people to ever run for any office. A former Republican, Davis divorced her husband and abandoned her children after he paid for her law school. She just ran an ad attacking Abbott’s paraplegic status. The issue now is not how badly Abbott trounces Davis, but how much collateral damage she does to Texas Democrats everywhere. Even if Texas were not a Republican state in a Republican year, she would still be political ebola.

NEBRASKA — Outgoing Governor Dave Heinemen was well-liked and non-controversial. In this Republican state in this Republican climate, that is more than enough for his successor Pete Ricketts to glide into office.


Massachusetts — This was supposed to be the safest race in the union for Democrats, who somehow nominated the only liberal Democrat even capable of losing in this state. Martha Coakley is uninspiring, and the overwhelmingly liberal state has elected moderate Republican governors. Charlie Baker fits that mold. Even in a Republican climate, Baker still has an uphill climb, giving the edge to Coakley by default.

Arkansas — The Senate race is where all the attention is, allowing the governor to float above the fray. While Republicans have made plenty of inroads here, conservative Democrats can survive even with a Republican wave expected. However, Republican Asa Hutchison has a presence in the state, and name recognition matters. Hutchison should beat Democrat Mike Ross in a squeaker.


ARIZONA — Democrats desperately want this seat to rebuke the GOP for its aggressive stand against illegal immigration. The problem is that most Arizona voters, unlike the national media and coastal elites, actually want the border enforced. Outgoing GOP Governor  Jan Brewer was a lightning rod, but she won. Her successor Doug Ducey will as well especially since he is facing a non-descript bureaucrat  from the state Board of Regents.

This year shows plenty of incumbents in varying degrees of trouble. Unlike the Senate battles, the Republicans have more governorships to lose because they have more to defend. Despite this, expect very few states to flip.


ILLINOIS — Democrats own the state, but incumbent Pat Quinn is detested and the state is practically bankrupt. Republicans have a strong challenger, but even in a Republican year it may be too much to ask the people who worship Barack Obama to change. It will be ugly, but Quinn will survive. He will most likely get plenty of votes from dead people, felons and illegal aliens from Mayor Rahm Emanuel’s Chicago.

COLORADO — John Hickenlooper is toast for allowing former New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg to cajole him into pushing gun control. Conservatives have pushed back hard, ousting two anti-gun Democrats in recall elections. Incumbent Hickenlooper is dragging down the entire Democratic ticket. Democrats turned Colorado from red to blue on other issues, but destroyed themselves the moment they came for the gun owners. Hickenlooper is gone. Congressman Bob Beauprez will win.

CONNECTICUT — Incumbent Dan Malloy is one of the least like governors in the country in a state with some of the highest taxes. Malloy has also been caught in a corruption scandal, which seems to happen to many Connecticut governors. Connecticut is liberal, but a national GOP wave and a strong challenger should be enough to take Malloy down in a close fight with Thomas Foley.


SOUTH CAROLINA — Incumbent Nikki Haley is not a slam dunk, but she is relatively safe in conservative South Carolina. Overall voters like the job she has done. In this climate, she should be fine.

IOWA — Incumbent Terry Branstadt is a comfortable pair of shoes for Iowa voters. He stays out of trouble and avoids crazy talk. A normal Midwesterner should be safe among his fellow normal Midwesterners. The Iowa Senate race has all the action, and the excitement seems to be on the Republican side. That could provide reverse coattails for Branstadt, who does not thrill or anger people.

TENNESSEE — If not for his trucking company being caught up in malfeasance, incumbent Bill Haslam would be a lock for reelection. Tennessee is still reliably Republican, and in this climate that should be enough. Haslam appears to have weathered the storm and should win again.

NEW MEXICO — Incumbent Susanna Martinez is a very well-liked Hispanic Republican woman in a state with many Hispanics. The only reason she is not cruising as easily as her Nevada counterpart is because her state leans more Democrat. Nevertheless, in a Republican year the well-liked, competent, telegenic Martinez should win without too much of a struggle.

OHIO — John Kasich is the luckiest governor in America. This incumbent took on the unions, enraging the left. Yet unlike his fellow Midwestern governors, Kasich had the fortune of going up against a Democrat who self-destructed under the weight of a sex scandal that could have a toxic effect on the entire Ohio Democrat party. Kasich is far from exciting as it gets, but in Ohio, a nuts and bolts grinder who gets the job done gets reelected.

MICHIGAN — Rick Snyder is another incumbent Midwestern governor who put his head down and went to work without much fanfare. His handling of the Detroit bankruptcy showed him to be a competent and effective manager. He managed to handle the crisis in a way that did not put the left in a state of rage like in neighboring states. By tackling the toughest crises while remaining inoffensive, this incumbent became that rare breed of politician who is seen as trusted. This gets him reelected.

WISCONSIN — The unions and the rest of the leftists are still out for blood against incumbent Walker. This will be his third election in four years for the same job, and he will beat the left again. He went big and bold, and his bets paid off. He took on the unions, refused to back down, and became a national hero to conservatives despite his relatively low-key style. In a Republican year, all the leftist outrage in the world will not be able to alter the reality that his term has been successful. Wisconsin is open for business, and the voters know it.

KANSAS — Under normal conditions, especially in a national GOP climate, incumbent Brownback should be coasting to a landslide win in this reliably red state. Unfortunately, tough economic times have led Kansas Republicans to be among the most vulnerable red state Republicans in the country. A much tougher than expected Senate race is not helping matters. The national GOP wave should be enough to save Brownback, but it will be a dogfight. He will eke out a win.

MAINE — Incumbent Paul LePage is a bombastic firebrand, a tea party guy and proud of it. He won in 2010 with only 37 percent of the vote in a state known for its strong independent streak. Democrats are making him a top target to be replaced, but his combativeness, while not always helpful when governing, is an asset on the campaign trail. It will be another brutal three-way race, but LePage may just confound the experts again. It will be a nail-biter, but the national mood should give him the slight edge to win reelection.

FLORIDA — Charlie Crist was well-liked when he was a Republican Governor riding Jeb Bush’s coattails. Then he became an independent and is now a Democrat. He is as flashy as incumbent Rock Scott is stoic. This is truly an election about style over substance. Scott has been  very successful governor, but he is just not good at bragging about his accomplishment. He prefers letting his deeds do the talking. This could be the battle of the hare Crist against the tortoise Scott. A national GOP wave should be enough to allow Scott to grind out another hard-fought victory. Crist wants to be seen as bipartisan, but enough people may conclude that he simply stands for nothing and lacks any core belief beyond getting elected.

PENNSYLVANIA — Tom Corbett is the most vulnerable Republican incumbent in the country. His major mistake was being too timid. Unlike his counterparts in Wisconsin, Ohio and to a lesser extent Michigan, he refused to fully go after the unions. Combine that with his quiet demeanor like his Florida counterpart, and this leads to a Governor who just does not inspire. He is another guy who represents substance over style, but a lack of boldness will do him in. He is too far behind to come back in a state that Republicans frequently have trouble winning in. Corbett is probably going down to defeat.

CONCLUSION: 2014 was supposed to be the year the Democrats took back the gains Republicans made in 2010. A national GOP wave in the sixth year of an unpopular president will lead to a rude awakening for Democrats. They will pick up one GOP governorship in Pennsylvania while losing the governorships in Colorado and Connecticut. Democrats will also lose the open seat in Arkansas. Despite already holding a 29-21 advantage, the Republicans will have a net gain of two to end up with Republican governors in 31 states to only 19 for the Democrats.

Click here for reuse options!
Copyright 2014 Communities Digital News

• The views expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of the editors or management of Communities Digital News.

This article is the copyrighted property of the writer and Communities Digital News, LLC. Written permission must be obtained before reprint in online or print media. REPRINTING CONTENT WITHOUT PERMISSION AND/OR PAYMENT IS THEFT AND PUNISHABLE BY LAW.

Correspondingly, Communities Digital News, LLC uses its best efforts to operate in accordance with the Fair Use Doctrine under US Copyright Law and always tries to provide proper attribution. If you have reason to believe that any written material or image has been innocently infringed, please bring it to the immediate attention of CDN via the e-mail address or phone number listed on the Contact page so that it can be resolved expeditiously.

  • Caleb Morrow

    Can’t help but sense that this article is a bit biased.

    • blacktygrrrr


      I am an opinion columnist. I am allowed to be biased. It clearly states I am an opinion columnist. Most people who obsess over “bias” do so because it is not bias in their favor.

      So rather than offering a comment without any substance, tell me specifically what you find objectionable.

      Tell me where you think I am wrong and why. That is what separates a thoughtful commenter from a thoughtless one.

      eric @ the Tygrrrr Express

      • Caleb Morrow

        Never said you were wrong, just said it seems biased. Don’t need to make an argument put of everything mate!

  • Luis

    The schools will do Corbett in. The closing of the schools especially in the Philadelphia area. Yes im aware of the stimulus funds running out…thats not the point and it actually made Corbett look worse..Also job growth is the State is at stand still..

    • blacktygrrrr

      Excellent points. In Ohio, Indiana and Wisconsin, Governors took on the unions including the teachers’ unions and won. Job growth has been quite good. As you say, that is not the case in Pennsylvania, which falls on Governor Corbett.

      eric @ the Tygrrrr Express

  • Rayjets

    Garbage article with baseless lies in my state. Lol trash.

    • blacktygrrrr

      Said the thoughtless commenter too lazy to point out anything that I said that is factually wrong. I am not sure if you have ever written an actual article, but I suspect what you really meant to say is you disagree with me but cannot articulate why.

      eric @ the Tygrrrr Express

      • Rayjets

        LOL. You pointed nothing out but some surface level opinion on Florida. You said nothing at all helpful in predicting the race – you know fact based assessment. Honestly its hard to say you said anything to back up very weak opinions like “stoic vs flash”. LOL, so stupid there is nothing to address because you said nothing. You truly are the thoughtless one but pretend to bring substance in your trivial canned comment replies. Your “predictions” provide no insight nor resemble a coherent opinion. Waste of peoples times who are searching for predictions like I was when directed here.

        • Rayjets

          Just for kicks, I read your comments on FL yet again. The turtoise, the hare, LOL again. What is this a children’s book? What are you talking about, you sound like a moron. I’m sure you are a nice guy in real life but if you honestly read your FL comment and think you said anything of value or anything at all….. wow. Its laughable. I pray you recognize this for everyone’s sake.

          • blacktygrrrr

            Said the coward hiding behind the fake screen name. Write an article, put your name on it, and then come talk to me.

            Any drunk in the town square can tear down. Try building something.

            Try bringing something positive to this world. Based on your nasty tone, I do not see you doing that.

            You started out by saying my column contained “lies.”

            Yet you did not name one. You seem to confuse venom with truth.

            I expect you to learn nothing from this, because some people enjoy tossing out venom “just for kicks.”

            eric @ the Tygrrrr Express

          • Rayjets

            Settle down. Clearly you cannot take criticism. Why ask for feedback when what you really want is ego stroking? Turn comments off if you think those commenting are cowards behind keyboards.

            Sorry I am not flying out to wherever you live to talk to you in person so I must be a coward. (Sarcasm)

          • blacktygrrrr

            Criticism is fine. Anonymous criticism is the stuff of cowards.

            Perhaps you support the online teenagers who drive innocent other teenagers to suicide through abusive online behavior.

            You are no better than they are.

            I can handle your criticism just fine. I just think ALL internet forums should require people to use their real names. It would lead to an increase in civility. It would also increase worker productivity since employees would be less likely to waste company time and money if they could be caught.

            (Exceptions can be made for people in domestic violence support groups worried their spouse will track and kill them, and other similar forums where anonymity is necessary to stay alive)

            In other words, liberals are totally against removing anonymity because they like acting the way they do.

            Newspapers require that all letters to the editor include a name and city. The internet should be no different.

            Also, I never asked for your feedback. You offered it. I find most commenters to be useless. 99% of readers never comment, and the 1% who do comment vastly overstate their own importance.

            The reason you comment anonymously is because you want to make the world worse. Some people just like to watch the world burn. You are one. People who care about improving society do so publicly.

            Deep down you know this.

            eric @ the Tygrrrr Express

          • Rayjets

            I love the ad hominem attacks. Laughable yet again how you seem to know so much about something (me in this case) with next to no facts (only fact in this case is I simply said you wrote nothing of value about FL.)

            You are not a teenager so settle down with your incredible stretches to compare. Those leeps of logic are exactly why I think your article is bad.

            Honestly what difference does my name make? I can use disqus to post on many sites – its convenient. The creators of disqus made a useful contribution to society – you should applaud them based on your comments.

            Ps switch to Facebook comment system if name and location matter so much to you. I am simply using the tools your site provides me.

          • blacktygrrrr

            The election is over. My predictions were accurate. I would tell you what to do with your smugness but the American people told you and the rest of your ilk for me.

            Feel free to make another snide comment. It won’t change the election results. The verdict is clear.

            You don’t matter.

            eric @ the Tygrrrr Express

          • Rayjets

            Cool man. Your commentary about FL still sucked (said nothing of value) and you may be the the most unable to take a simple criticism individual ever encountered. Enjoy your craziness. You truly are sad and pathetic in that regard. Go tell a few more people they don’t matter you hypocritical loser. Everything you posted in this exhange just showed how much of a liar you were in addition to writing a poor article. Its pretty funny actually.

            I am happy with the election results so not sure what the American people told me nor does that somehow change anything about you. I just feel sorry for anyone who knows you you egomaniac, they probably are on suicide watch. So long and enjoy the craziness.

          • blacktygrrrr

            Thank you Mr. Gutless Coward Anonymous Commenter.

            I was right, you were wrong, and you’re just bitter.

            I am fine with criticism from people who matter. Your unwillingness to accept that I was right about my election predictions tells me you don’t matter.

            Everything I predicted happened. It must bother you when someone you attack gets it perfectly right.

            Enjoy your Obama-inspired temper tantrum. I would ban you from the site myself but maybe my editors think people like you provide value.

            Now keep ranting and raving. It will not change that my side won and your side lost badly.

            eric @ the Tygrrrr Express

          • Rayjets

            LOL 🙂

  • Wisconsin Voter

    I do think you are a bit off on the Wisconsin issue. Yes there could be a case to talk about the unions but most of the talk is about jobs and the economy. Walker has been constantly investigated throughout his entire term and his school voucher program and jobs record is a joke. During the debates on TV nobody was even talking about the unions, and Walker didn’t even answer some of the questions. I know you are Republican and that’s fine. I’m a Libertarian just at least do your research because at the very least an article should have some facts in it.

    • blacktygrrrr

      Wisconsin voter, do not assume I do no research. I do plenty of research.

      You represent one voice. Other people I talk to in Wisconsin are still burning over the union issue. Others still say his job record has been impressive.

      This is not an exact science, but I am comfortable with my methodology.

      eric @ the Tygrrrr Express

    • blacktygrrrr

      Walker won comfortably. I was right.

      eric @ the Tygrrrr Express

  • Armond

    Jerry Brown wins reelection by over 17%…he spends just $2.5 million on his campaign in the nation’s largest state…his only campaign was for 2 ballot measures…to deal with water…and to establish a rainy day fiscal savings fund

    his two state-wide ballot measures…won each by over 66%

    he eliminated a 26 billion dollar deficit left by his republican predecessor…now has the state in surplus…and even with democratic super-majorities…he consults and is respected by the state’s republican legislators…his vetoes have been against democratic proposals

    in a state with no immigrant hate…no blaming of blacks for crime and the source of all the states problems…increased educational spending…investment in infrastructure

    yes he still needs to address to a greater extent…public employee retirement benefits…but so far…he has done this…without blaming Unions…or the other political party…but rather has focused his argument for change…on good fiscal policy

    back to his campaign…$2.5 million…the most fiscally responsible politician in the Nation

    and for the 2nd time…he leads the state with an all democratic state-wide elected leadership team

    his California Supreme Court Appointments…all approved by state voters by over 66%

    including Justice Goodwin Liu…who he appointed…after National Senate Republicans rejected Liu’s appointment to a federal judgeship

    Brown has stated…that he will lead California…against the National trend…by continuing to be…a fiscally responsible progressive politician

    yet in this article…seems the claim…is Jerry will lead California off a cliff

    if the cliff is the same old policies that led to the national 2008 economic collapse…that’s a cliff the people of California…want the state to leap

    now over at Cato they gave him an “F”…and up in Maine…LePage gets an “A”

    how is this possible…when he eliminated a $26 Billion deficit in 3 years…by selective cuts to social spending…and increased taxes on wealthy wage earners…with an increase of over 8% in state spending this year…he included $11 Billion to pay down hidden debt…left by republicans

    and…”all” tax increases…he took directly to the voters for their approval…even though he had a democratic super-majority in both houses of the state’s assembly

    his budget…also leaves a nearly $2 Billion one year surplus…the best in the Nation

    yet not once…are immigrants or black Americans or the poor…the cause of the state’s problems…seems at least in California…they are part of the solution…in a well run state