The economics of Amnesty mean we must make English our official language


OCALA, Fla., November 27, 2014 — The movement to make English the official language of the United States has to do with creating a future in which people from diverse backgrounds find common ground with one another.

It also pertains to dollars and cents. Despite the federal government’s numerous attempts to stimulate the economy, America remains caught within the Great Recession’s clutches. Might our lack of a national official language is somewhat to blame for this?

“There is no question that we could easily reduce federal spending by eliminating unnecessary and costly translations services,” Robert Vandervoort, the executive director of ProEnglish said. “An official English law would help save taxpayer dollars.

“To the extent that wasteful government spending on translations hurts our economy, this is one area we should all agree to cut. Also, the government discourages assimilation by continuing these unnecessary translations. To the extent that immigrants are not encouraged to learn English, it is another hindrance on our economy.”

Mauro E. Mujica, the chairman of U.S. English, has said that “(s)tudies have shown that Americans who lack fluency in English trail the rest of the nation in education and economically. For example, an immigrant who speaks English well earns 33 percent more than an immigrant who speaks English poorly. An immigrant who speaks English very well earns 67 percent more.

“More than three-quarters of students who test ‘below basic’ in English fluency on 8th grade tests will drop out of high school, and as a result, will face added difficulty finding a job. It has been estimated that $65 billion a year is lost due to poor language skills.”

There is also the savings for business in not having to reproduce signs, documents and add translations to product labels.

Adopting English as our official language, and demanding that immigrants learn the language, is an idea that can gain traction on both ends of the political spectrum.

“Official English has support from all sides of the political spectrum,” Vandervoort claims. “Polls show official English is supported by the majority of Americans, regardless of political party, race, education, income, etc. Even most recent immigrants support it.  Our opponents are a small, multicultural elite who nevertheless has the ear of many politicians and those in the media.”

Mujica mentioned that “(t)he English language is a bond that reaches far beyond political party. U.S. English recently commissioned Harris Interactive to conduct a poll to gauge the support for Official English laws among the American people. This poll found that 96 percent of Republicans, 83 percent of Democrats and 89 percent of Independents agreed that English should be the official language of the United States.”

Placing polls and financial matters aside, how might adopting English as our official language help recent immigrants, or those in the process of immigrating legally?

“If immigrants know that English is our official language, it will encourage more of them to assimilate and learn English,” Vandervoort remarks. “Studies show that immigrants who know English earn higher wages than immigrants who do not know English. This is not surprising, and is all the more reason why we should make English our official language.”


Click here for reuse options!
Copyright 2014 Communities Digital News

• The views expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of the editors or management of Communities Digital News.

This article is the copyrighted property of the writer and Communities Digital News, LLC. Written permission must be obtained before reprint in online or print media. REPRINTING CONTENT WITHOUT PERMISSION AND/OR PAYMENT IS THEFT AND PUNISHABLE BY LAW.

Correspondingly, Communities Digital News, LLC uses its best efforts to operate in accordance with the Fair Use Doctrine under US Copyright Law and always tries to provide proper attribution. If you have reason to believe that any written material or image has been innocently infringed, please bring it to the immediate attention of CDN via the e-mail address or phone number listed on the Contact page so that it can be resolved expeditiously.

  • James Crockett

    For the record, here are the last four years of W. Bush deficits, compared to the first four years of Obama deficits: W. Bush2005: $318 Billion 2006: $248 Billion 2007: $161 Billion 2008: $459 BillionObama2009: $1.41 Trillion 2010: $1.29 Trillion 2011: $1.30 Trillion 2012: $1.09 Trillion

  • Alma Coin

    In 2009, the Obama regime wasted $400,000 trying to figure out why homos in Argentina engaged in homosexual sodomy while intoxicated.