DNC leaks confirm establishment stranglehold

The biggest factor determining whether the latest leaks have legs is Bernie Sanders himself, and his speech tonight at the Democratic convention.

Cartoon image courtesy of Wikileaks.com (no copy right infringement intended)
Cartoon image courtesy of Wikileaks.com (no copy right infringement intended)

WASHINGTON, July 25, 2016 – The leaked emails from the Democratic National Committee regarding support for Hillary Clinton come as a shock to no one, but a disappointment to many.

The latest episode in the 2016 election drama dropped last week, when Wikileaks released over 19,000 emails and more than 8,000 attachments from DNC staffers. The overwhelming message in the volumes of emails is that the DNC, under leader Debbie Wasserman Schultz, had the fix in for Hillary Clinton from the beginning.

Philadelphia Democrat Convention: The bloodbath begins to simmer

Not only did the party want Clinton as the nominee, it was prepared to take whatever steps necessary to get her there.

As Dr. James Picht noted last week:

From that trove of documents at least three important findings have emerged since Friday:

  • The DNC colluded with media executives to shape the narrative away from Sanders and for Clinton and to stop stories critical of DNC chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz;
  • There was extended discussion in the DNC about ways to discredit Sanders, including an attack on his religious beliefs and attacks on his campaign organization;
  • The DNC joint fundraising efforts with the Clinton campaign laundered money to Clinton and away from down-ticket campaigns.

Bernie Sanders and his supporters likely were not surprised by the revelations, considering they had complained bitterly about the system that allocated super delegates to Clinton regardless of popular choice. They also lamented the DNC’s backing of Clinton from the very beginning of the primary contests, almost begging Wasserman Shultz to give them a fair chance.

Even so, seeing the words on the page will leave a bitter taste in the mouths of Sanders supporters who were on the verge of following the Vermont senator into the Clinton camp.

Pushed? Wasserman Schultz falls on her sword

The emails also are not surprising in terms of the DNC as a whole. The party was unlikely to back enthusiastically someone who was not only a party outsider, but was not even a member of the party until recently. Like the Republican establishment’s discomfort with Donald Trump, the DNC is wary over Bernie Sanders’ willingness to play nice with party rules. And that discomfort apparently sent the Democratic Party into Clinton overdrive.

If the intrigue of American political gamesmanship isn’t enough, there are also unsubstantiated allegations that Russian President Vladimir Putin is behind the leaks, as part of a plot twist to help Trump.

How those emails will impact the November election is now the real question. Even though no one on the Sanders side is shocked by the news of political insider trading, they still sting.

Protesters in Philadelphia ahead of the Democratic National Convention are angry and calling out the DNC for its inside politics games. Media reports suggest that some Sanders supporters are now refusing to back Clinton, with others saying they will even support Trump as a way to “get back” at the DNC.

For Clinton, there is likely some relief in the timing of the leak. A July release is far less damaging than an October or November announcement, giving the Clinton campaign time to rev the damage control into high gear.

The courting of Sanders supporters and emphasizing the number of Sanders ideas that made it into the platform combined with the demise of Wasserman Shultz, who will step down after the convention, and anti-Trump rhetoric may be enough to stem the hemorrhage.

However, for Clinton, votes from the Sanders camp are now far from assured.

The most important factor determining whether the latest email scandal remains relevant or whether it is a Melania-like blip on the radar screen is Bernie Sanders himself.

His speech tonight at the convention will likely set up the next episode of Election 2016.

Click here for reuse options!
Copyright 2016 Communities Digital News

• The views expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of the editors or management of Communities Digital News.

This article is the copyrighted property of the writer and Communities Digital News, LLC. Written permission must be obtained before reprint in online or print media. REPRINTING CONTENT WITHOUT PERMISSION AND/OR PAYMENT IS THEFT AND PUNISHABLE BY LAW.

Correspondingly, Communities Digital News, LLC uses its best efforts to operate in accordance with the Fair Use Doctrine under US Copyright Law and always tries to provide proper attribution. If you have reason to believe that any written material or image has been innocently infringed, please bring it to the immediate attention of CDN via the e-mail address or phone number listed on the Contact page so that it can be resolved expeditiously.

Previous articleClinton picks Kaine to shore up foreign policy creds
Next articleSwitzerland’s common sense citizenship sets global example
Lisa M. Ruth
Lisa M. Ruth is Editor-in-Chief of CDN. In addition to her editing and leadership duties, she also writes on international events, intelligence, and other topics. She has worked with CDN as a journalist since 2009. Lisa is also President of CTC International Group, Inc., a research and analysis firm in South Florida, providing actionable intelligence to decisionmakers. She started her career at the CIA, where she won several distinguished awards for her service. She holds an MA in international relations from the University of Virginia, and a BA in international relations from George Mason University. She also serves as Chairman of the Board of Horses Healing Hearts, and is involved with several other charitable organizations, including Habitat for Humanity, The Boys and Girls Clubs of America, and AYSO.