WASHINGTON: Since taking control of the House last year, watching the Democrats is not unlike watching a demolition derby. Pelosi, Schumer, Schiff, Green, and the Squad, to name a few, all driving tired, beaten up, divisive narratives, as fresh as a demolition derby car. The question is what is driving the Democrats demolition derby of hysteria over a conversation between Presidents Trump and Zelensky? A conversation they both know is being listened to, recorded. It is simple.
Ukraine knows exactly what went transpired between the Obama administration – Obama, Biden and Clinton and the oligarchy of Ukraine. Hunter and Joe Biden, while actions are questionable, are nothing more than a way to distract away from the very real crimes that hurt America. The collusion of Obama and Clinton, et al., in the creation of the Russian hoax dossier.
The previous Ukrainian government feeding dirt on Manafort and Trump to the American Ambassador. Who dutifully turned it over to the State Department and the DNC. The DNC approaching the Ukrainian embassy for dirt on Manafort and Trump.
Christopher Steele and Clinton crony Sydney Blumenthal using Ukrainian government sources for the phony Steele dossier. Outside of the obvious Biden Corruption, Ukraine was intimate with interfering with our 2016 election to help Hillary Clinton.
Which means the democrats entry into this derby may very backfire on them.
Because while President Trump may have some egg on his face for inartful statements, now the Democrats have now opened Pandora’s Box of the Russia Hoax and Clinton – Obama – Russia collusion.
What President Trump says to President Zellinsky is:
“I would like you to do us a favor though because our country has been through a lot and Ukraine knows a lot about it. I would like you to find out about this who situation with Ukraine, they say Crowstrike… I guess you have one of your wealthy people… The server, they say, Ukraine has it. There are a lot of things that went on, the whole situation.
“…but they say a lot of it started with Ukraine.” (See transcript below for entire conversation)
Note, no mention of Biden.
The President is asking about the genesis of the Russia hoax. And this scares the hell out of Democrats, particularly those that might find themselves in a court of law. Which makes Clinton’s tweet the abstract-district of the party.
The president of the United States has betrayed our country.
That’s not a political statement—it’s a harsh reality, and we must act.
He is a clear and present danger to the things that keep us strong and free.
I support impeachment.
— Hillary Clinton (@HillaryClinton) September 25, 2019
Because she is throwing shade in order to shade herself. Its projection on a grand scale.
In Andrew McCarthy’s “Ball of Collusion: The Plot to Rig an Election and Destroy a Presidency” he writes
It is in connection with Paul Manafort that we encounter some genuine collusion targeting the 2016 campaign: willful collaboration among foreign governments, the Obama administration, and the Clinton campaign.
Just a week after the campaign introduced Carter Page as a Trump foreign policy adviser, it announced that Manafort had been brought on board, too. The consultant was an old political hand, experienced managing the rough-and-tumble of a convention fight.
Manafort had longstanding, lucrative political consulting (and other business) arrangements with Ukrainian and Russian oligarchs who had Kremlin ties. These arrangements had already been spun into a narrative of political corruption in 2007 and 2008 by Glenn Simpson — then a Wall Street Journal scribe. In 2016, as the Fusion GPS impresario, Simpson would pull these articles off the shelf to help weave the Russia-gate tale.
Paul Manafort stepped into the FBI investigative cross-hairs due to then Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovych being his client.
Continuing McCarthy’s narrative:
Kyiv became so dependent on Washington for desperately needed financial support that, by threatening to withhold funds, Vice President Joe Biden pressured Poroshenko into firing Viktor Shokin, one of his top prosecutors. Shokin just happened to be investigating a natural gas company called Burisma, which just happened to have placed Hunter Biden, the vice president’s son, on its board of directors.
While the Veep pushed the International Monetary Fund to grant Ukraine a $17.5 billion loan package, Burisma lavishly compensated Hunter’s law firm, to the tune of more than $3 million over an eighteen-month span. A lot of money? Sure, but it’s chump change compared to the Chinese government’s $1.5 billion infusion in a joint investment fund with Hunter Biden while Vice President Biden, administration point-man on China issue, turned a blind eye to Beijing’s aggression in the South China Sea.
It is hard to imagine that any American, regardless of party, would not question the collusion between Obama, Biden, and Clinton in order to destroy Donald J. Trump and enrich the Hunter Biden coffers. It is important to note that Biden was the point man who led Obama’s policy toward Ukraine.
Hunter Biden, Ukraine and China
Peter Schwizer and the Government Accountability Institute spent three years investigating former Vice President Joe Biden and his son, Hunter. Some results of that investigation include (Biden Ukraine dealings – 7 essential facts) that Hunter Biden, joined the board of Ukrainian energy company Burisma in April 2014.
This despite the fact that Hunter Biden has little background in energy. Burisma paid $3.1 million to a Hunter Biden bank account. The payments only stopped last April, just before Biden announced his run for the Presidency. Coincidence. I think not.
In his role as Vice President, Biden helped shape Ukraine’s energy and anti-corruption policies, issues that directly impact Burisma.
The New York Times reports (Biden Faces Conflict of Interest Questions That Are Being Promoted by Trump and Allies) that Hunter Biden assemble the Burisma company’s legal team, which consisted of American attorneys and consulting firms, including a former Obama Justice Department official. The allegation is that Burisma sought to capitalize on the Biden name and relationship.
In the article Trump right to question Biden dealings with Ukraine, despite Dem Criticism) Schweitzer writes:
On April 16, 2014, White House records show that Devon Archer, Hunter Biden’s business partner, made a private visit to the White House for a meeting with Vice President Biden. Five days later, on April 21, Joe Biden landed in Kyiv for a series of high-level meetings with Ukrainian officials.
Soon the United States and the International Monetary Fund would be pumping more than $1 billion into the Ukrainian economy,
Burisma has been under legal and financial scrutiny. Britain froze $23 million of former President Zlochevsky’s assets as part of a corruption investigation. Schweitzer also reports that financial records from Morgan Stanley show numerous lines of money going into the account of “Robert H. Biden.” The funds originated from oligarchs and anonymous LLCs in Ukraine, China, Kazakhstan and elsewhere.
Taking advantage of the family name and political connections, in 2013, Biden and his son Hunter flew aboard Air Force Two to China. Ten days later, Hunter Biden’s firm scored a $1.5 billion deal with a subsidiary of the Chinese government’s Bank of China.
Ringing the impeachment bell
Before the transcript was released, Nancy Pelosi called for an impeachment inquiry.
Where we are at now is that you have those that agree with President Trump. This is another case of creating a crisis over a hoax to deflect from the real crimes. Just like the Russia Hoax. America spent three years in Hell. The Trump presidency virtually derailed by the Clinton – Obama Russia hoax.
As our President, Trump is to bend over and take it from yet another Democrat hoax whose invention is to deflect from urgent matters of corruption, criminality, and Ukrainian interference in the 2016 election.
Now there is an anti-corruption president in Ukraine. A president who is well aware of what’s going on and where the bodies are. It is the Presidents duty to inquire with other heads if state about corruption and the possible involvement of American citizens.
Is Trump not to ask about what how the Russia dossier came to be? Whether the missing Clinton emails are in Ukraine. How the DNC conspired with the Obama White House and used Ukraine as their personal piggy bank of corruption in their quest to destroy citizen, candidate, and President Donald Trump.
Every American needs to read the transcript. Those that see claim to see evil in the crotch of the tree in a forest of corruption are going to scream Presidential overreach. Others see this as a normal conciliatory conversation between two world leaders.
But compare what President Trump and President Zelenskyy of Ukraine and then consider what then-Vice President Joe Biden bragged about. How he told Ukraine’s leadership that they had to bow to his demand, to remove a prosecutor, or forgo cash support from the U.S.
The other question American’s need to ask themselves is whether we want to know what Democrats did when they were in power. Does Ukraine have Hillary Clinton’s server contents, before she illegally BleachBit the contents of that server? You can rest assured that John Durham is looking into all of this.
From a position of national security and Russia, if Ukraine does have the server contents, and emails that have conveniently disappeared, then so does President Putin. Because he has held an iron fist over Ukraine.
What Ukraine knows, Russia knows. Guaranteed.
So what did Clinton and Obama share that can be used against the U.S.? Well, we won’t know unless President Zelensky agrees to find out. And among many other security and criminality concerns, maybe that is what President Trump was asking on behalf of the American people. How compromised are we?
President Trump had every right, and indeed, the duty to begin exploring these very sensitive topics with President Zelensky. That’s what Democrats are afraid of. Democrat hysteria is a sad attempt to deflect from the coming IG report on the Russia Hoax and the inevitable indictments of senior Obama administration officials by John Durham. This isn’t about interfering in the 2020 election.
This is about what happened in Ukraine to interfere in the 2016 election. No amount of hysteria can deflect from that.