Conservatives and liberals should agree on real immigration reform

Source Flickr Author ep_jhu

OCALA, Fla., May 30, 2014 — Preserving what has made America the world’s superpower should be the goal of any concerned citizen.

This does not take into account whether one leans left or right. By understanding that economic power is inseparably tied with immigration trends, anybody can take a stand for a more prosperous future. After all, if the American Dream is not about personal success at heart, then what does it pertain to?

Over the last few decades, our economy has been sacked by free trade agreements. While these sent many manufacturing jobs — formerly the base of our labor market — to foreign lands, remaining stateside jobs are often filled by low-cost workers. Quite often, they are here illegally, and even when not, on work visas which give employers the ultimate upper hand.

READ ALSO: Will immigration amnesty make Hispanics finally vote GOP?

In the immediate past, this situation has mainly impacted the working and lower-middle classes. Now, white collar folks are beginning to feel the pinch; especially across the information technology field.

Such an obvious problem should be able to unite all reasonable political factions in the search for a viable solution. Unfortunately, this is not the case.

“There are both conservative and liberal reasons for reducing legal immigration and stopping illegal immigration,” Jo Wideman, the executive director of Californians for Population Stabilization, one of America’s foremost groups addressing population-related issues, explained to me last year. “Some reasons for opposing illegal immigration include concerns for sensitive borderlands, the impact of population growth, the effect on schools, downward pressure on wages for low-income workers, terrorism and security, injustice to those who follow the rules, and the lack of respect for the rule of law.

“In today’s polarized political environment, politicians tend to exacerbate their policy differences rather than to seek common ground. 
“While many right-wingers do embrace the cause of immigration restriction, especially curbing illegal immigration and enforcing our nation’s immigration laws, actually, immigration is an issue that has traditionally cut across party and ideological lines. (However, as battle lines have hardened, and wagons have been circled ever more tightly during the past decade or two of struggle, this may be somewhat less the case than in the past.) Many left-wingers in particular have been relentless in demonizing anyone who favors less immigration or more effective immigration enforcement as racist and xenophobic.

READ ALSO: Jeb Bush proves that America needs real immigration reform

“This has tended to silence many centrists and left-of-center Americans who would rather not be so smeared. No less than Earth Day founder Gaylord Nelson, a Democrat, former two-term Wisconsin governor and three-term U.S. Senator from that state, referred to this vilification as left-wing McCarthyism.

“The fact is that the founders of some of the nation’s leading immigration restriction organizations are environmentalists first and foremost and are deeply concerned about the injurious effects of mass immigration on U.S. population growth and the environment. Groups such as CAPS not only care about the environment but also about the plight of American workers of all ethnic and racial backgrounds faced not just with offshoring in this globalizing world, but also a veritable flood of immigration.

“It is a myth that immigrants only take those jobs that Americans no longer want and therefore do not compete with American workers. Excessive immigration is responsible for unemployment, underemployment, and depressed wages and working conditions, not just for the working class (e.g. janitors, dry-wall hangers, gardeners and construction workers) but increasingly, for high-tech professions, such as IT and engineering, as well.”

Click here for reuse options!
Copyright 2014 Communities Digital News

• The views expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of the editors or management of Communities Digital News.

This article is the copyrighted property of the writer and Communities Digital News, LLC. Written permission must be obtained before reprint in online or print media. REPRINTING CONTENT WITHOUT PERMISSION AND/OR PAYMENT IS THEFT AND PUNISHABLE BY LAW.

Correspondingly, Communities Digital News, LLC uses its best efforts to operate in accordance with the Fair Use Doctrine under US Copyright Law and always tries to provide proper attribution. If you have reason to believe that any written material or image has been innocently infringed, please bring it to the immediate attention of CDN via the e-mail address or phone number listed on the Contact page so that it can be resolved expeditiously.

  • AZXyb

    It is good to read an article that admits to the evils of overpopulation, even if not stated so baldly. However, I am disappointed that the statement, “…economic power is inseparably tied with immigration trends…” does not correct the erroneous implication that illegal migration and immigration (which by definition is a legal activity approved by the host nation) are the same thing. While legal immigration may be tied to economic power, illegal migration certainly is not. If one wishes to know what illegal migration is tied to, one need only visit Los Angeles and other enclaves of illegal aliens. IMO, it is not in any way desirable. Additionally, what is offered as a truism, quoted above, is not necessarily true in the 21st Century. Huge influxes of legal aliens did bring economic prosperity to a nation that had vast tracts of undeveloped land and cities in dire need of infrastructure to bring, for the first time, water, electricity, natural gas, telephone and sewage services, as well as railroads and highways to connect the cities and rural areas. The nation is no longer undeveloped and the infrastructure is crumbling under the burdens of overpopulation and age.

    Illegal migration is not a boon to any nation. Illegal aliens are a drain on the nation’s resources, foster lawlessness, and endanger national security. Turning a blind eye to it, or worse, legalizing illegal aliens, additionally facilitates the corrupt and inept governments that produce other nations’ illegal aliens. Should those broken governments not be held to account? While no one is talking about eliminating legal immigration altogether, given unemployment, population and economic reality, it is certainly prudent to limit legal migration in both number and character, while eliminating illegal migration and ridding the nation of the presence of illegal aliens.