Abortion has saved America (Especially conservatives)

Both sides of the abortion fight

OCALA, Fla., July 22, 2014 — If you think that abortion should be legal, but lean right on other issues, do you deserve a voice in the conservative movement?

The answer should be an enthusiastic “Yes!”. This isn’t because the pro-choice perspective is morally superior and therefore impervious to criticism. Not by a country mile. It is because movement conservatives have fewer and fewer friends these days. Demographics are changing, and new voters don’t much care for Reaganomics or W. Bush-style “family values”.

Unfortunately, no small number of righties seem unconcerned with this.

READ ALSO: The Obamacare contraception mandate and Hobby Lobby: Religious freedom in the balance?

Most Americans have probably heard about DailyKos. It is perhaps the most influential political blog in our nation. A haven for leftish activists, the website has played a pivotal role in restructuring the Democratic Party. Should one wish to discover how the Democratic Leadership Council and centrist liberals lost control over their Party’s future, DailyKos is a fantastic place to start.

The blog’s opposite number is RedState. While RedState never attained the power which DailyKos did, it is a formidable presence among rightist crusaders. RedState’s chief editor is a fellow named Erick Erickson. Over the past few years, he has commentated on cable news and served as councilman in Macon. His attendance record was less than inspiring and he stepped down before his term ended to pursue a talk radio career.

While in office, Erickson called for city police to disband as some officers wanted to unionize. He also called former Supreme Court Justice David Souter a “goat ****ing child molester”. This was not in some private conversation, but on Twitter for all to see.

Needless to mention, Erickson is pro-life. He is so against abortion rights that anyone who believes in them is forbidden from contributing to the front page of RedState. According to the outspoken Christian, who is now training to become a minister, this is the core principle on which his website rests. Should said principle be violated, he and others will abandon the blog.

READ ALSO: Social conservatism lost in 2012 and will lose in November

That declaration, issued shortly after Independence Day, has generated little controversy among movement rightists. Quite the opposite, in fact. Erickson appears popular as ever.

Such a situation raises red flags on too many levels to count. At the forefront are American conservatism’s post-Roe v. Wade electoral victories. The National Right to Life Committee claims that 54,559,615 abortions have been performed following 1973. It’s clear that those seeking out abortions do so because they are in dire situations. If they were to become parents, our society would have far more dysfunctional families.

We must remember that — irrespective of race, ethnicity, or religion — those born into desperate settings often lead desperate lives. Social mobility doesn’t go nearly so far as it should. Inconvenient as it is to admit, especially in our supposedly classless nation, this is how generational poverty develops and perpetuates. One can hardly imagine that 50 million-plus individuals born into unfortunate circumstances would have made America better.

Economists Steven Levitt and John Donohue did some interesting research several years back. They ultimately found that America’s drastic crime drop since the 1990s is due to Roe v. Wade. The reasoning is simple: Women who didn’t want children didn’t have them. If they did, though, their kids would’ve been prime candidates for criminal activity.

All of this should make it clear that if not for Roe v. Wade, we’d be part of the third world. Fiscal responsibility, let alone the Republican Party, would be fodder for history books. The welfare state would have reached its current level years before, and by now grown to communistic proportions. Violent crime would make medieval English forests look like gated communities built around golf courses.

That’s only for starters.

To think that Erickson and his fellow travelers call themselves “conservative” is pure tragicomedy. It’s tragic since American conservatism is continually deprived of clear thinkers, instead attracting theological zealots. It’s comedic because there is nothing more radically leftist than giving one’s nation away to those who, saying the least, are not stewards of their communities.

The leftists taking control of America’s time-honored institutions must laugh themselves to sleep over these folks. Who can blame them?

Does our military have a Christian superiority complex?

Fmr. Capt. Mikey Weinstein, head of the Military Religious Freedom Foundation, talks about this and more on the latest episode of Cotto & Company.

More News Podcasts at Blog Talk Radio with Communities Digital News Hours on BlogTalkRadio
Click here for reuse options!
Copyright 2014 Communities Digital News

• The views expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of the editors or management of Communities Digital News.

This article is the copyrighted property of the writer and Communities Digital News, LLC. Written permission must be obtained before reprint in online or print media. REPRINTING CONTENT WITHOUT PERMISSION AND/OR PAYMENT IS THEFT AND PUNISHABLE BY LAW.

Correspondingly, Communities Digital News, LLC uses its best efforts to operate in accordance with the Fair Use Doctrine under US Copyright Law and always tries to provide proper attribution. If you have reason to believe that any written material or image has been innocently infringed, please bring it to the immediate attention of CDN via the e-mail address or phone number listed on the Contact page so that it can be resolved expeditiously.

  • Anthony

    Aren’t we confusing “solving a problem” with “eliminating a problem”? If we quietly rounded up the chronically homeless in our cities, identified the ones with no close family ties, and disposed of them, I have little doubt that we would lower crime rates, lower the number of people collecting government assistance, and other desirable outcomes. Clearly, if we weed out undesirables in this manner, all kinds of social and economical benefits might arise. The real question is, would we be justified in taking human life in this way, for the betterment of society?

    If abortion is such a social good, why shouldn’t we permit abortion until several months after birth? That way, we could humanely end the lives of those infants who sustained life-long injuries during birth, or whose defects were only discovered after birth.

  • Montesquieu

    Those who harbor nefarious intentions tend to subvert freedom by insisting that the temporary views of fleeting majorities justify charting courses opposed to morality, liberty, and prosperity.

  • Jen Eral

    Without centralized power to coerce, small groups of quacks and academics have no way to force people to chase their ever-shifting mirage of utopian illusions.