The prosecution of Christina Tutt and homeschooling: Texas judge removes children from home

Tutt Family / Facebook public image
Tutt Family / Facebook public image

DALLAS, January 12, 2014 — A Duncanville couple has been in a custody battle with state officials because of their decision to homeschool their children.

Trevor and Christina Tutt have four biological children and three adopted children, and have been in the process of adopting two other children. Two of their biological children are grown and not living in the home.

The Tutts have also been serving as foster parents and work with Safe Families for Children, an organization that seeks to help keep families intact by offering temporary care for children as well as assistance for parents. At the time of the incident, the Tutts were caring for a sibling group of five children placed by a private agency in an emergency situation. Following that placement, Child Protective Services had placed an infant with the Tutt family.

According to a report by the Texas Home School Coalition (THSC), a home-school advocacy group, the catalyst for the eventual removal came on September 21 when a four-year-old foster child with autism wandered away from home. The Tutts’ eight-year-old child followed and stayed with the four-year-old. Both children were found and returned to the home by a police officer, who voiced concerns about the number of children in the home as well as the fact that the four-year-old had soiled himself during the incident, according to THSC. The officer reported the family to Child Protective Services, which then launched an investigation.

The CPS officer who investigated acknowledged, “There is no problem here,” during an examination of the Tutt house. However, she apparently disapproved of Christina Tutt’s decision to stay home, saying, “Nobody in their right mind would want to stay home all day with so many children!” She issued a safety plan requiring the Tutts to take parenting classes and for Christina Tutt to have a psychological evaluation.

On October 31, 11 days after the safety plan expired, the caseworker returned and received documentation of the many parenting classes they Tutts had taken in their work with Safe Families, as well as information from Christina Tutt’s doctor and verification of family therapy session.

On November 14, in an ex-parte hearing — meaning the Tutts were neither present nor informed of the hearing — Dallas County District Court Judge Graciela Olvera ordered the Tutt children removed from their home. Although Texas law stipulates that such action occur immediately, the removal happened a week later on November 21.

A December 4 hearing was scheduled. In the interim, the guardian ad litem appointed by the judge asserted that the children were insufficiently educated based on her educational evaluation. While the Tutts were not accused of abuse or neglect, their decision to homeschool their children caused the judge to remove the children from their home.

At both the December 4 and the December 16 hearings, Judge Olvera maintained her decision to keep the parents from their children, although no charges of abuse of neglect were ever made. The guardian ad litem would not agree to the return of the children unless “the Tutts agree to place their children in public school and never home school them,” according to THSC.

Representatives of the Tutts disagree with the lawyer’s educational assessment, but regardless, THSC notes that educational choices are not to be taken into consideration when removing children from a home, according to Texas law. A 2005 memo from the Texas Department of Family and Protective Services notes that, “Whether parents choose to home school their children or send their child to another private or public school is not relevant to the CPS investigation. When CPS staff investigates a family for abuse/neglect, the investigation must focus on the occurrence, or risk, of abuse/neglect and not on the child’s educational setting.”

Despite this, THSC President Tim Lambert said the hearings involved in this case “have spent an inordinate amount of time on the home schooling of the children and their academic status. … Texas does not have ‘educational neglect’ nevertheless, CPS has had a great focus on that in this case.”

On January 7, the Tutts were given a new hearing with a new judge who looked solely at the issue of removal. According to an update on the Support the Tutts Facebook page, “The judge found no abuse or neglect and agreed the children should not have been removed.” Four of the children will be returned to the Tutt family. The children who did not return include the two children whose adoptions were pending and the oldest child from a previous marriage who is is currently with his father.

However, the children are to remain in public school pending further educational evaluations. Lambert says that this case should be a cause of concern for all homeschool families, “since all it takes is an anonymous phone call to have a family under investigation by CPS and if, with no evidence of abuse or neglect, a judge or CPS can remove children simply by alleging that the children are behind academically, then many families could be at risk.”

Click here for reuse options!
Copyright 2014 Communities Digital News

• The views expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of the editors or management of Communities Digital News.

This article is the copyrighted property of the writer and Communities Digital News, LLC. Written permission must be obtained before reprint in online or print media. REPRINTING CONTENT WITHOUT PERMISSION AND/OR PAYMENT IS THEFT AND PUNISHABLE BY LAW.

Correspondingly, Communities Digital News, LLC uses its best efforts to operate in accordance with the Fair Use Doctrine under US Copyright Law and always tries to provide proper attribution. If you have reason to believe that any written material or image has been innocently infringed, please bring it to the immediate attention of CDN via the e-mail address or phone number listed on the Contact page so that it can be resolved expeditiously.