Sunspots 2014: Record setting month; more coming!

BBSO/NJIT: Big Bear Solar Observatory produces the most detailed sunspot images ever seen

AUSTIN, July 3, 2014 – Solar sunspot Cycle 24 continues to defy the odds, with perhaps the highest secondary-peak above its first peak in the entire 400-year history of sunspot cycles.

For the fourth month in a row, the monthly sunspot number dropped. Yet for the fifth month in a row, a new solar maximum record for the cycle was set! Solar max has inched up to 76.0 above last month’s 75.4 record, still an exceptionally weak maximum.

Also, last month the new Big Bear Solar Observatory made headlines with a video showing the most detailed observations ever recorded during an evolving sunspot.

Solar maximum rises again

SILSO data, Royal Observatory of Belgium, Brussels: New solar maximum set in June
SILSO data, Royal Observatory of Belgium, Brussels: New solar maximum set in June

Is this latest record it, or are there more records to come?

The surprising answer is that, even if the monthly sunspot number continues declining at its current pace for seven straight months, solar max will continue to rise for the next three months! Under those conditions it will top out between 77 and 78 spots.

How can that be? The unexpected answer lies within this exciting formula:

Rs= (0.5 Rm-6 + Rm-5 + Rm-4 + Rm-3 + Rm-2 + Rm-1 + Rm + Rm+1 + Rm+2 + Rm+3 + Rm+4 + Rm+5 + 0.5 Rm+6 ) / 12

Rs is the 13-month smoothed sunspot number. Rm is the base monthly count and the other Rs are the six months before and after the base month. The months on either end are only given half credit.

Before all you sunspot wonks out there start screaming, “There are better formulas than that one! I read it in the Astrophysical Journal!”, remember — this formula is what the Royal Observatory of Belgium uses, and they are the world’s official record keepers of sunspot counts. Their calculation determines the accepted solar maximum and minimum of sunspot cycles.

If there is a steady decline in the average daily sunspot count of six spots per month for the next several months, then solar maximum will reach a final peak of 77.5 that will get reported three months from now.

However, the sun is anything but steady and reliably predictable. Sunspots could drop off faster, or there could be another sudden burst of activity. One never knows.

Big Bear makes big news

The Big Bear Solar Observatory (BBSO/NJIT) drew interest at the 224th meeting of the American Astronomical Society (AAS) early last month with their video showing fine details within an evolving sunspot.

They’ve discovered changing penumbral structures and light bridges growing over the black abyss at the centers of sunspots. They’ve also been able to see bright speck-like light structures between the convection granules that cover the rest of the sun.

BBSO/NJIT produces high resolution multi-wavelength images by combining their own earth-based data with NASA’s IRIS and SDO spacecraft data to achieve “unprecedented spatial and temporal resolutions.” The earth-based data actually surpasses the best resolution that can be seen from space.

BBSO is tied with the McMath Solar telescope at Kitt Peak National Observatory for world’s largest. Both have 1.6 meter main mirrors. McMath was built in the early 1960s, but BBSO is new, completed just a couple years ago.

What sets BBSO apart from other solar observatories is that it is built in the middle of a lake — Big Bear Lake in California, to be specific. Water completely surrounding the observatory reduces surrounding air turbulence which greatly improves image quality. BBSO also has some of the most advanced computer technology available, which makes their images razor sharp.


The sun continues to confound scientists by doing its own thing without regard to our expectations. The size of Cycle 24’s secondary peak, still forming, is completely unexpected. It looks like solar max will continue to rise for several more months, even if monthly sunspot counts continue to fall.

Scientists at Big Bear Solar Observatory provided new insights last month into why sunspots continue to exist when they should be instantly annihilated by a turbulent sun. They released stunning new imagery at last month’s AAS meeting.

Improvements in instrumentation and theories are producing greater insights into the inner workings of our star, but there is still a long way to go before we will be able to accurately forecast the sun’s next moves.

Click here for reuse options!
Copyright 2014 Communities Digital News

• The views expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of the editors or management of Communities Digital News.

This article is the copyrighted property of the writer and Communities Digital News, LLC. Written permission must be obtained before reprint in online or print media. REPRINTING CONTENT WITHOUT PERMISSION AND/OR PAYMENT IS THEFT AND PUNISHABLE BY LAW.

Correspondingly, Communities Digital News, LLC uses its best efforts to operate in accordance with the Fair Use Doctrine under US Copyright Law and always tries to provide proper attribution. If you have reason to believe that any written material or image has been innocently infringed, please bring it to the immediate attention of CDN via the e-mail address or phone number listed on the Contact page so that it can be resolved expeditiously.

  • Scott Dailey

    You lose. Please feel free to play again. And it only took two weeks for you to eat your words. The politically correct scientists are afraid their funding will be cut if they admit the evidence points to the sun going into an extended quite period. But over the next decade the AGW frauds will latch on to this as the reason for the lack of global warming.

    • Steve Davidson

      It would take a sunspot number below 40 in July to prevent another solar max from being set this month. Given the high sunspot activity through the first 13 days of July, that won’t happen even if there are no sunspots at all visible for the rest of the month. Solar activity is on its down phase for Cycle 24, but it isn’t over yet.

      • Scott Dailey

        Your entire statement proves the formula is flawed no matter what organization uses it. And only 6 of the 13 numbers are set unless you have a time machine (6 months before, >>6 months after<<). Since the forecasting did not predict this quiet period, or even the second solar max, it can only predict possible trends.

        • Steve Davidson

          Scott… here are some things to consider:
          First, if you take the time to look at the Sunspot Number Progression graph above, you will see that the new sunspot max actually happened in December 2013, not in July, 2014. It’s marked on the graph. No magic wands or time machines involved. (see the blue line)

          Second, the formula is globally accepted by the entire scientific community. It’s not made up. The Royal Observatory of Belgium isn’t just an “organization”. It is the world’s official record keeper of the nearly 400-year sunspot record.

          Third, I get a weekly bulletin from the Belgium Observatory. Each week’s bulletin has an estimated sunspot number for each day of that week. So far this month there have been three bulletins covering the first 21 days of July.

          As of the 21st, using the formula above, the monthly sunspot number is already up to 55, and that assumes there isn’t a single spot observed on the sun for the rest of the entire month. The sunspot number would have had to come in below 40 to prevent a new maximum peak being set.

          It’s now mathematically impossible to avoid setting a new solar max peak this month.