Sunspots 2014: March is another record-breaking month

NASA: Solar prominence of April 16th, 2012

SALEM, Ore., April 3, 2014 – Another new solar sunspot record peak of 73.2 was set for Cycle 24 last month. It smashed the old 68.9 record peak set the previous month.

In a big surprise, the number is now over six spots higher than the first sunspot peak set in early 2012 and will probably go higher. A secondary peak above the first this much is almost unheard of.

The new sunspot peak is unusual for two conflicting reasons:

  1. The secondary peak is higher than the first
  2. Current physics suggests the solar cycle should be weakening

Conflicting signals coming from the sun muddles how it might affect earth’s future climate. A more active sun will have a warming effect. A less active sun, predicted by most solar physicists, will have a cooling effect.

The sun hasn’t decided what it wants to do yet.

Author: Generated from SIDC data released Aprik 1st, 2014
Author: Generated from SIDC data released April 1st, 2014

The Royal Observatory of Belgium’s Solar Information Data Center (SIDC) released the official sunspot number for March on April 1st. March averaged 92.2 spots/day. It’s down over 10 spots/day from 102.8 in February.

The reason Cycle 24 set another record high peak is because the peak is a calculated 13-month average and sunspot activity has been higher for the last six months. 13-month averaging smoothes out wildly fluctuating monthly numbers.

Sunspot activity linked to earth climate

A new research paper published last month in India’s International Journal of Scientific Research (IJSR) found an inverse relationship between solar sunspot activity and cosmic ray intensity. The fewer sunspots there are, the more cosmic rays reach earth’s surface.

Yearly average count rate of cosmic ray intensity is well correlated with yearly mean of sunspot numbers, solar flare index and coronal index
IJSR, P.L. Verma et al., March 2014

This is an important result because cosmic rays are suspected triggers of cloud formation. The more cosmic rays there are, the more clouds are formed. More cloud cover has a cooling effect on earth.

The CLOUD experiment at CERN is searching for a suspected connection between ionizing radiation (cosmic rays) and cloud formation. Though the suspected link has not yet been found, promising early results connect sulfuric acid aerosols to cloud formation.

CERN, which straddles the Swiss-French border, is the world’s largest particle accelerator where the famous Higgs-Boson particle was discovered.

During the 11-year sunspot cycle solar variability doesn’t stay long enough in one condition to have a measurable effect on earth’s climate. The IPCC doesn’t account for it in climate modeling.

The sunspot cycle is a highly variable feature of the sun. Sometimes it gets weak or disappears entirely; as happened during a 75-year period called the Maunder Minimum when it got so cold it was named the Little Ice Age.

Prolonged solar inactivity reduces the solar wind and allows ionizing radiations, like cosmic rays, penetration to the earth’s surface. That or related processes potentially cools the planet.

Is the next Maunder Minimum at hand?

Three key pieces of evidence from a 2011 solar physics meeting suggest the sun is slipping into another extended period of solar inactivity:

  1. The solar jet stream for Cycle 25 is delayed
  2. Solar magnetic field strength is weakening
  3. Weakening of the poleward surge in coronal magnetism

Put all together, these three diverse results convinced most solar physicists in 2011 that Cycle 25 will be exceptionally weak.

The current solar cycle, Cycle 24, is already the weakest in 100 years even with the resurgence of sunspot activity over the last six months.

The first official prediction for the peak of Cycle 25 is only seven spots.


The sun is sending mixed signals. Until six months ago all major measurements suggested the sun’s 11-year solar cycle was about to take a siesta for at least one cycle, maybe more.

Apparently, the sun hasn’t been reading the scientific literature. Since last October, it developed one of the highest secondary sunspot peaks compared to its first, if not the highest ever measured.

The secondary peak will probably go up again next month. No solar physicist saw it coming.

Are sunspots fading away, or coming back? At this point, nobody knows for sure what is going on or how it will affect climate change.

Click here for reuse options!
Copyright 2014 Communities Digital News

• The views expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of the editors or management of Communities Digital News.

This article is the copyrighted property of the writer and Communities Digital News, LLC. Written permission must be obtained before reprint in online or print media. REPRINTING CONTENT WITHOUT PERMISSION AND/OR PAYMENT IS THEFT AND PUNISHABLE BY LAW.

Correspondingly, Communities Digital News, LLC uses its best efforts to operate in accordance with the Fair Use Doctrine under US Copyright Law and always tries to provide proper attribution. If you have reason to believe that any written material or image has been innocently infringed, please bring it to the immediate attention of CDN via the e-mail address or phone number listed on the Contact page so that it can be resolved expeditiously.

  • Godot

    How will tis information be twisted into more Global Warming hysteria, I wonder, since it implys a natural cause rather than my wood stove.

    • Steve Davidson

      It’s easy! All natural causes that add to global warming are dismissed, leaving only human-caused global warming to explain it. 😉

      • sheldon

        The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change was never designed to find anything except human-caused climate change. It’s in their mandate to find only “human-induced climate change”. Nothing else will be funded. Gee, I wonder what the scientists are going to find…

        The role of the IPCC is to assess on a compre
        hensive, objective, open and transparent basis the
        scientific, technical and socio-economic information
        relevant to understanding the scientific basis of
        risk of human-induced climate change, its potential impacts and options for adaptation and mitigation.
        IPCC reports should be neutral with respect to policy, although they may need to deal objectively with
        scientific, technical and socio-economic factors releva
        nt to the application of particular policies.”

        • Steve Davidson

          Thanks for expanding on my cavalier response to Godot.