CATHEY: Richard Strauss and the culture crisis of the modern age

1918 portrait of Strauss by Max Liebermann

WASHINGTON, May 10, 2014 — For a number of years I’ve greatly admired and enjoyed the music of the German composer Richard Strauss (1864-1949). In listening to Strauss, I hear a great champion of Western culture, standing athwart the onrushing decline and decay of Western music and art during the first half of the twentieth century. Recently, I went back to listen in detail to several of Strauss’s works. Re-hearing them, I think some reflections are suggested that may have resonance as our society sinks deeper into cultural decay.

Consider Strauss’s monumental mythical opera, Die Frau ohne Schatten [“The Wife without a Shadow”]:  it could well be a musical metaphor for his view of marriage, and serve as an affirmation of life as a gift from the Creator, as it is a passionate defense in music of child birth and motherhood, and per extension, of the  family. The story is a combination of fantasy and myth, with strongly symbolic elements that have much to say to our present-day society.

READ ALSO: The Met Simulcast: ‘Werther’ is brilliant; faulty satellite feed ruins final moments for viewers

The main character, the Empress, is barren–symbolized by her lack of a shadow–and has every chance to seize a peasant woman’s shadow, thus enabling her to become fertile and have children. But coming to understand the sublime love that exists between the peasant woman and her husband Barak and the importance of children to them, she cannot bring herself to follow through with such an evil act, even when the life of her husband, the Emperor, depends on it. Fathoming this, she summons up moral courage and utters a refusal to take the peasant woman’s shadow: “Ich will nicht” — “I will not.” And because she now understands the importance of the marital bond between husband and wife, and the significance of the procreative act and child birth, miraculously, she too then is granted a shadow and the ability to bear children. The opera ends with a monumental chorus of children yet to be born. It is a moving story line.

Strauss, with his full understanding of modern tonality, was a reactionary when it came to composition and “tunefulness.” Like the Empress in Frau ohne Schatten, to the deconstructive tendencies of modernism in music, he too uttered: “Ich will nicht!” Strauss uses the full panoply of “modern”  instrumentation and soaring melody to make a valiant stand for continuity and tradition in music. In a sense Strauss stood against the early 20th century “Vienna School” of dodecaphonic (“twelve tone”) music of Arnold Schoenberg, Alban Berg, and others, which seemed to over-intellectualize and cut off the artist and separate him from traditional sources of inspiration, while making his creations inaccessible to a vast majority of listeners.

In 1945, after viewing the horrible ruins of his beloved Munich, its famous opera house and so much more bombed into smithereens, an aged Strauss composed his deeply moving “Metamorphosen” for string ensemble. A meditation on both the insanely destructive power of war and a concomitant musical commentary on Europe’s apparent cultural suicide, “Metamorphosen” also, by its very title, suggests something more, something yet hopeful amid the ruins.  For a “metamorphosis” or re-birth for Strauss was still possible, despite his own innate longing for a more civilized and decent age apparently now gone.

READ ALSO: Andrea Bocelli: Singing with the warmth and passion of amore

Four years later, in 1949, Strauss composed his “Vier Letze Lieder” (“Four Last Songs”) only a few months before his death, and thirty years after the premiere of Die Frau ohne Schatten in Vienna. These four songs are a remarkable tribute not just to his late, autumn-like genius, but a final, glorious tribute to the incredibly vibrant and rich cultural milieu of late Imperial Habsburg Vienna and Wittelsbach Munich where his career flourished. To listen to these short songs is to hear a noble artist of great culture, achievement, and sophistication bidding good-bye to all that is grand and truly estimable in Western tradition.

In the fourth song, Im Abendrot –“In the Gloaming” — (a setting of a poem by Eichendorff), Strauss consciously says farewell, not only to his own well-lived life, but also to a civilization with which he has had a passionate love-affair, but now is in steep decline.

The words of the song bespeak what Strauss observes in post-war Europe:

Around us the valleys fold up,

already the air grows dark,

only two larks still soar

wistfully into the balmy sky.


O spacious, tranquil peace,

so profound in this gloaming.

How tired we are of traveling –

Is this perchance death?

Yet even here in what seems a wistful good-bye to a great and noble culture lost, Strauss injects a quotation from his much earlier tone poem, Death and Transfiguration, indicating that there is always a glimmer of hope for “transfiguration” and eventual renewal, if we strive for it.

As in Die Frau ohne Schatten, the “Four Last Songs,” and in his operas Der Rosenkavalier and Arabella set in the glory days of Habsburg Vienna, Strauss evoked marvelously a past time of civility, high culture, and grace, reminding our barren age of just what we have thrown away and discarded. And in so doing he joined the battle for our culture and our future, a battle that continues and encompasses our cultural institutions and traditions, our art, our architecture, our film, our music, and so much more—integral elements that help shape and form us, and without which our lives are made barren and susceptible to disintegration and dissipation.

Too many times our contemporary society does not know how to compare and contrast the real achievements of our civilization with the present cultural detritus that surrounds and threatens to inundate us. Recall the Hilaire Belloc statement about western civilization now surviving off the fumes of a once-great culture. Is this not where we are now? Our challenge today is to comprehend and then to preserve what is being lost or forgotten. The task is multi-faceted and must encompass our broader cultural milieu and those great artistic accomplishments that have been produced in and by our culture. Strauss, despite his wistful celebration of a golden past, never lost hope for the future. Nor can we.

Click here for reuse options!
Copyright 2014 Communities Digital News

• The views expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of the editors or management of Communities Digital News.

This article is the copyrighted property of the writer and Communities Digital News, LLC. Written permission must be obtained before reprint in online or print media. REPRINTING CONTENT WITHOUT PERMISSION AND/OR PAYMENT IS THEFT AND PUNISHABLE BY LAW.

Correspondingly, Communities Digital News, LLC uses its best efforts to operate in accordance with the Fair Use Doctrine under US Copyright Law and always tries to provide proper attribution. If you have reason to believe that any written material or image has been innocently infringed, please bring it to the immediate attention of CDN via the e-mail address or phone number listed on the Contact page so that it can be resolved expeditiously.

Previous articleThe seeds of Mother’s Day were planted during the Civil War
Next articleThink your child is safe from sex traffickers? Think again
Boyd Cathey
Boyd D. Cathey holds a doctorate in European history from the Catholic University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain, where he was a Richard Weaver Fellow, and an MA in intellectual history from the University of Virginia (as a Jefferson Fellow). He was assistant to conservative author and philosopher the late Russell Kirk. In more recent years he served as State Registrar of the North Carolina Division of Archives and History. He has published in French, Spanish, and English, on historical subjects as well as classical music and opera. He is active in the Sons of Confederate Veterans and various historical, archival, and genealogical organizations.
  • Hans Olo

    Since each of us derives most of liberty’s benefits from the use of liberty by those unseen, others’ liberty is just as important as our own.