Keystone Pipeline Debate: Not about sound energy policy

What the Keystone Pipeline discussion is really about.

Excavation for Keystone, phase I, already completed.
Excavation for Keystone, phase I, already completed. (Via Wikipedia, circa 2009)

WASHINGTON,  January 5, 2015 — As Republicans take full control of the Legislative Branch, one of their first priorities is to force a showdown with President Obama over the Keystone XL Pipeline. Certainly, the issues of affordable energy and energy security in general are just as important as environmental concerns, landowner rights and States rights. But the Keystone Pipeline issue is no longer about crafting sound public policy.

That said, any debate over the Keystone Pipeline is thoroughly irrelevant when the project becomes economically unfeasible. Within the last decade, the US has reclaimed the title of world’s number one oil producer. It has also reduced its consumption of energy through improved efficiency. Consequently, the need for the Keystone Pipeline is not as pressing as it was in 2008 when supply and demand where headed in opposite directions.

Furthermore, the reality that the price of oil is near $50 a barrel and expected to stay there for some time, or fall even more, means the pipeline issue now rests on the willingness of investors to continue investing.  Given the pipeline is intended to ship heavy crude, which is more expensive to produce and process, the reality that oil is now below the production cost of heavy crude makes investment in the Keystone Pipeline far less sound.

Recognizing recent policy shifts that will help the oil industry export and import greater amounts of crude, the need for the Keystone Pipeline may no longer exist, even if heavy crude becomes profitable again.  Although producers will be able to take advantage of higher foreign prices, the greatest windfall to the United States is the ability of producers to use existing pipeline to transport Canadian oil. In other words, the Keystone Pipeline may not be needed.

In fact, this policy shift helps address concerns about falling oil prices and future decreases in oil production. Current excess oil production is seen as a positive since it lowers energy prices, yet it discourages new investment and undermines future production. By paving the way for Canadian oil to enter the US through existing means, producers will be able to tap already existing oil fields and increase their exploitation of oil sources they have already developed at lower production costs.

Considering the Obama Administration is seeking to promote the growth of “cleaner” energy sources and Republicans are concerned with energy security, the changes in the economics put both sides on the same page. Consequently, the policy debate between Republicans and President Obama should shift toward preserving existing pipeline and improving the transportation of all energy sources, i.e., nature gas and electricity as well as oil.

Unfortunately, the real struggle over the Keystone pipeline is not over sound policy and the interests of the American people. It is about satisfying a grudge the Republicans have with the Obama Administration. It is also about a political Left unwilling to recognize the need for robust oil production to provide for the energy needs of the American People in the near-term and, more importantly, supply a cheap source of hydrocarbons in the future.

Moreover, both sides needs work together to development better energy policies for America’s present and future energy security.

Click here for reuse options!
Copyright 2015 Communities Digital News

• The views expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of the editors or management of Communities Digital News.

This article is the copyrighted property of the writer and Communities Digital News, LLC. Written permission must be obtained before reprint in online or print media. REPRINTING CONTENT WITHOUT PERMISSION AND/OR PAYMENT IS THEFT AND PUNISHABLE BY LAW.

Correspondingly, Communities Digital News, LLC uses its best efforts to operate in accordance with the Fair Use Doctrine under US Copyright Law and always tries to provide proper attribution. If you have reason to believe that any written material or image has been innocently infringed, please bring it to the immediate attention of CDN via the e-mail address or phone number listed on the Contact page so that it can be resolved expeditiously.

Previous articleGlobal warming: Bring it on!
Next articleOil drops below $50, as Wall Street takes a New Year header
My name is Matthew Justin Geiger; I currently hold a BS in physics and psychology based politics from Allegheny College of Meadville, Pennsylvania. I am the creator/manager/editor of ​The Washington Outsider. I am a freelance writer, political analyst, commentator, and scientist presenting my views through news sites like The Washington Outsider, Communities Digital News (CDN) and I also host the shows "The Washington Outsider" and "FocusNC" on local news station startup NCTV45 in New Castle, PA. In addition, I have written a short story collection, “​Dreaming of​ Other Realities,” two novellas “​Alien Assimilation” and “​The Survivor,” and a poetry collection, “​A Candle Shrouded in Darkness” available on ​Amazon. My goals are to offer my opinions and skills to those who are in need of an honest, professional consultant or freelance writer.
  • talbertwv

    Mathew all you say is true. What you didn’t point out is that this is an example of an administration denying private industry the right to invest their money in a project they have determined was a good investment. Over 6 years of governmental studies there has been no finding that this project should not proceed and yet the administrating refuses to let it for strictly political reasons. This is bordering upon criminal activity.

  • Miss Terr

    It’s very simple, actually: Low solar activity leads to global cooling, cool summers, and cold winters.