A tax plan where everyone, including the middle-class, wins

President Obama said in the State of the Union that we need the rich to pay a little more. We can do that with a flat tax.

10
3271
As inevitable as death / Image: DonkeyHotey, used under Flickr Creative Commons license
As inevitable as death / Image: DonkeyHotey, used under Flickr Creative Commons license

WASHINGTON, January 21, 2015 — An important element of President Obama’s State of the Union and the chatter afterward is Federal Income Tax policy.  Everyone wants something, and there seems to be no plan that allows everyone to get what they want.

Or is there? There is a federal income tax plan that will give Obama more revenue to spend on social programs, give Congress the lower tax rates that they deem necessary, give taxpayers the fairness and equity they want, give businesses incentives to expand, bring home the $2 trillion held by U.S. businesses outside of the country, and almost eliminate the corrupt IRS.

The plan is easy to administer, produces no market distortions, increases economic growth, reduces unemployment, helps to alleviate poverty, and reduces income inequality.  It also solves the problem of having capital taxed at a lower rate than labor, and eliminates the need to pay professionals to complete our very complex tax forms. Virtually everyone gets what they want.


READ MORE: The fix for government spending, taxes and economic growth



Here’s the plan: All income above a livable minimum is taxed at a single rate, no matter how that income is earned or used. There are absolutely no deductions for anything.

There are a number of different combinations for pairing the tax rate with the livable minimum, but the most appealing is when the livable minimum is set at twice the poverty level and the single rate tax is set at 15 percent. The corporate rate is also set at 15 percent.

How would that impact a typical family of four?

Suppose the family adds up all income from wages and salaries, rent, interest, profit, capital gains and dividends; the total is $70,000. The livable minimum is $50,000.  They owe tax on $20,000 which amounts to a $3,000 tax bill. The tax return is a simple form that anyone can complete without hiring a professional.

Let’s see how this plan gives everyone what they want.

This plan would generate about $200 billion more revenue annually than the current tax code, giving the President more money to spend on his programs. The lower tax rate would give Congress exactly what they want. Taxpayers would view this as fair since every taxpayer pays exactly fifteen cents of every dollar earned above the livable minimum. High income earners pay more total taxes than middle income earners, but every American pays the same rate.

The corporate tax rate of 15 percent increases profit in the short term and creates more incentive to invest in the long term. It also allows U.S. companies to bring the $2 trillion back to the U.S. The low 15 percent rate may even encourage foreign firms to locate here.


READ MORE: Reviewing the facts, fantasies and fallacies of The State of the Union


The low tax rate would accelerate economic growth, leading to more jobs which reduces unemployment and reduces the number of people relying on government assistance. The greater demand for labor would pull wages up, and the new jobs would reduce poverty as well as income inequality.
All income is taxed at the same rate, so capital and labor at treated exactly the same. Since there are no deductions for anything, no market distortions are created. Everyone wins.

The objection to this plan is that it looks like a tax cut for the wealthy at the expense of everyone else. The reality is that the wealthy currently pay rates lower than 15 percent. During the 2008 election, Warren Buffett asked why his tax rate is lower than his secretary’s; she paid 25 percent and he paid only 13 percent.

Buffett, like all high income earners, employs the most expert tax lawyers and tax accountants whose sole task is to structure his income so that tax liability is minimized. As a result he ends up with a 13 percent rate, or lower, as do many other wealthy people.

The reality is that under this plan, high income earners will pay more taxes.  They won’t mind, though, because this plan frees them to make business decisions based on economic factors rather than tax considerations.

If we fully consider this plan, we will find it is a winner for everyone and we all get what we want.

Click here for reuse options!
Copyright 2015 Communities Digital News

• The views expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of the editors or management of Communities Digital News.

This article is the copyrighted property of the writer and Communities Digital News, LLC. Written permission must be obtained before reprint in online or print media. REPRINTING CONTENT WITHOUT PERMISSION AND/OR PAYMENT IS THEFT AND PUNISHABLE BY LAW.

Correspondingly, Communities Digital News, LLC uses its best efforts to operate in accordance with the Fair Use Doctrine under US Copyright Law and always tries to provide proper attribution. If you have reason to believe that any written material or image has been innocently infringed, please bring it to the immediate attention of CDN via the e-mail address or phone number listed on the Contact page so that it can be resolved expeditiously.

  • Brain Duran

    Anyone? Aaaaaaaanyone?

  • Jared

    This sounds perfect and very fair, but our genius politicians didn’t come up with this, so it won’t even be considered.

  • acmaurer

    Flat tax. Great idea. It was 13% when Steve Forbes suggested it in 1996.

    • Tim Kern

      Any flat tax scheme involves the IRS, and is thus subject to immediate manipulation and therefore corruption. Anything reasonable that eliminates the IRS is better than anything that preserves it.

  • This is almost identical to the proposal that the leading independent Presidential candidate suggested in 2012. However, Federal Government spending also has to be controlled to curb the expansion of debt. The recommendation in 2012 was to index Federal spending as a percent of prior-year GDP (i.e., restricting the Federal Budget to 15-17% as has been the historical rate prior to recent Administrations). It also called for a percentage of the Budget to be used to retire debt to an acceptable level over a defined period of time.

    This approach would “encourage” the Federal Government to maintain a balance between regulations and services (i.e., eliminate regulations and programs that have a negative impact on GDP while focusing on those that would increase GDP). As the saying goes, “All ships rise with the tides.”

    Taxation is only one of the problems with Government. Unrestricted spending is another.

  • Tim Kern

    …or just tax sales. It’s fair, it encourages investment over spending, leading to real prosperity; and most-importantly, it kills the IRS completely and forever, removing the greatest internal terrorist threat to Americans.

    Remember: a tax plan that boasts it will maximize the government’s take is not really friendly… The Laffer Curve is only a roadmap for government to extract the greatest amount of loot without getting caught doing it.

    • As I mentioned in my book, “The National Platform of Common Sense,” the concept of a VAT is very interesting. Liberals should like it because it is the most “progressive” of all taxes. Conservatives should like it because it “encourages investment over spending” just as you have said. The challenge with a VAT is that our elected officials, bot Liberal and Conservative, view it as an addition rather than a replacement to the existing tax structure.

      As I have often said, “Our Government is most effective at ‘taxing’ our patience.” :o(

  • ThinkAboutIt

    The flat tax is a diversion and waste of time. The Congress is too divided to agree on such a comprehensive scrapping of the current tax system. Flat tax , consumption tax, and so all would require scrapping tax breaks for pension plans, for home mortgage deductions, deductions for state and local taxes, etc. Taxpayers and homeowners have made financial decisions of a lifetime based on such rules; they won’t standby to see their financial plans ruined. Even the House GOP caucus can’t agree among themselves, to say nothing of the Senate and the President.

    Over 90% of the complexity of the tax code is special rules that provide breaks for the wealthy and special interests and do NOTHING for the average middle class. It’s time to demand the Congress eliminate special interest tax giveaways. Republican promises of a comprehensive overhaul of the tax system will never happen in this Congress and it is an attempt by politicians to divert attention from real efforts to improve the tax code beginning with the most worthless special-interest tax giveaways.

  • ThinkAboutIt

    VAT, Fair Tax, flat tax, comprehensive overall of the tax code, etc are ALL FANTASIES. Not going to happen. The Congress can’t do entitlement reform even for one entitlement program. The House, Senate, and President struggle to pass an annual budget. Boehner can’t control the House GOP caucus. Do you get it?

  • letsbereal

    Until our government learns it cant spend more than it taxes out of us its all a moot point. Over one trillion in spending a year? Screw tax reform… how about some budgeting and spending reform. Open your eyes people.. it doesn’t matter how much they tax out of us or at what rate… because they spend more than that amount every year. Their spending is the problem not the tax codes. Our government has grown fat and happy on OUR tax dollars while they allow our economy and infrastructure to become anemic and dependant on redistribution of the wealthiest citizens to make it sustainable.