TAMPA, August 5, 2013 – Last week, Rep. Justin Amash, R-Mich., introduced an amendment to the Defense Appropriations Bill that would have limited the NSA’s blanket collection of metadata to those “relevant to a national security investigation.”
Amash’s amendment did not attempt to enforce the standard set in the Fourth Amendment, which requires “probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.” That the data to be collected are relevant to an ongoing national security investigation doesn’t mean that there is probable cause that the person whose records are collected has committed a crime.
That means that the Patriot Act is unconstitutional, according to any reasonable interpretation of the Fourth Amendment.
It is important to remember the difference between “constitutional” and “legal.” Legal means that the activity in question complies with existing law passed by a legislative body. Constitutional means that the legislative body had been given the power to pass the law in the first place.
The U.S. Congress not only wasn’t given the power to past the Patriot Act, it was strictly prohibited from doing so by the Fourth Amendment. Congress passed the legislation anyway. The NSA didn’t even bother to comply with that.
Not only was Amash’s amendment defeated, but its sponsors were met with a backlash of scorn and ridicule from Governor Chris Christie and other defenders of the national security apparatus, citing the need to protect Americans from terrorism, regardless of the legal and constitutional issues.
If legislators can pass laws exercising powers never consented to by the people, then what does the word “constitutional” really mean?
If government agencies can ignore legislation written specifically to govern their actions, where is the rule of law?
Tom Mullen is the author of A Return to Common Sense: Reawakening Liberty in the Inhabitants of America.
Click here for reuse options!
Copyright 2013 Communities Digital News
This article is the copyrighted property of the writer and Communities Digital News, LLC. Written permission must be obtained before reprint in online or print media. REPRINTING CONTENT WITHOUT PERMISSION AND/OR PAYMENT IS THEFT AND PUNISHABLE BY LAW.
Correspondingly, Communities Digital News, LLC uses its best efforts to operate in accordance with the Fair Use Doctrine under US Copyright Law and always tries to provide proper attribution. If you have reason to believe that any written material or image has been innocently infringed, please bring it to the immediate attention of CDN via the e-mail address or phone number listed on the Contact page so that it can be resolved expeditiously.