WASHINGTON, Jan, 11, 2016 — Obama’s ratings are abysmal, yet the GOP has done very little to earn voter enthusiasm. Many rank and file Republicans even believe the GOP is complicit with the Democrats in creating our current national woes.
Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, who has been one of the few GOP presidential candidates to get significant support aside from entertainer Donald Trump, began to get traction after a scathing attack on the Republican leadership that he waged from the House floor. He captured the attention of his colleagues and the media when he took Senate majority leader Mitch McConnell to task for allegedly lying to his colleagues over President Obama’s trade deal. That kind of red meat is always well received by grassroots conservatives.
Obama has said that middle America clings to “guns or religion.” He even said that guns come first. Yet this week, roughly a year before a new president will be inaugurated to replace him, he has expanded, through executive order, regulations on guns. In that order, the Obama administration is redefining “engaged in the business,” as defined in current Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) regulations. The goal is to redefine the term to include more non-licensees in the definition of “dealer,” in order to expand the number of background checks.
The Obama approach has backfired. Americans are responding to mass shootings and threats of more arms regulations by purchasing more guns. For many, the obvious fact that several of these events happened in “gun-free zones” makes it logical that they want to assure their own protection wherever possible.
The biggest “gun-free zone” for practical purposes, is Chicago, which has a population roughly the same as Houston but many times more the violent crime. No wonder Obama’s efforts are frowned on by average Americans and have led to a revolt of sorts. I’m sure many chuckled when he alluded, in his recent speech, to Chicago violence in his press conference on the new regulation, without mentioning that city’s restrictive gun laws.
GOP candidates for the White House immediately began to denounce the measure. Senior House Republican Kevin Brady, R-Texas, said,
Gun violence is real, but nothing will change as long as Obama keeps ignoring mental health care while targeting law-abiding citizens who responsibly exercise their Second Amendment rights. Let’s be honest, Mr. President, you’re playing politics and trying to circumvent Congress because your dictates are outdated, unconstitutional and won’t make this country one ounce safer. Until you get serious about real mental health care in America, I’ll fight hard to stop these political games.
Congressman Will Hurd, R-Texas, a former CIA officer, in a statement to my radio show, said,
President Obama’s announcement of his executive order to restrict the constitutional right of law-abiding citizens is yet another attempt to circumvent the legislative branch and impose his agenda on the American public. The president is ignoring that the law already requires people who sell firearms for a living to be licensed. He should instead target the criminals who aren’t following the law in the first place.
The level of executive overreach is outrageous and is another assault on the liberties our nation was built upon. The plain language of the Second Amendment guarantees the right to keep and bear arms. Congress will conduct vigilant oversight and this executive order will no doubt be challenged in the courts.
Obama’s decision is not particularly far reaching from a policy perspective, but rings a loud alarm to many Americans concerned about their gun rights. It shows the president is tone deaf as he places this albatross around the neck of the Democrats as they fight for their political lives in what is expected to be a very challenging election year.
What an odd parting present for a president to give to his party.
Well, at least the GOP appreciates it.Click here for reuse options!
Copyright 2016 Communities Digital News
• The views expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of the editors or management of Communities Digital News.
This article is the copyrighted property of the writer and Communities Digital News, LLC. Written permission must be obtained before reprint in online or print media. REPRINTING CONTENT WITHOUT PERMISSION AND/OR PAYMENT IS THEFT AND PUNISHABLE BY LAW.
Correspondingly, Communities Digital News, LLC uses its best efforts to operate in accordance with the Fair Use Doctrine under US Copyright Law and always tries to provide proper attribution. If you have reason to believe that any written material or image has been innocently infringed, please bring it to the immediate attention of CDN via the e-mail address or phone number listed on the Contact page so that it can be resolved expeditiously.