Jim Webb: A substantive candidate for president

Jim Webb: A substantive candidate for president

by -
0 1710

Webb's service to America as a member of the Navy, Secretary of Navy under Reagan, in the DOD and Congress make him ready for the White House

Jim Webb - from JimWebb.com
Jim Webb - from JimWebb.com

WASHINGTON, July 6, 2015 — Virginia Sen. Jim Webb’s announcement that he will be a candidate for the Democratic Party’s presidential nomination should be welcomed by Americans of every political viewpoint.

Jim Webb is a war hero, a serious man, one not given to reciting right-wing or left-wing cliches or to avoiding taking a position until his pollsters have told him where he stands.

A former Republican who served as secretary of the Navy for President Ronald Reagan, Webb, a graduate of the U.S. Naval Academy and a Marine, served as a rifle platoon and company commander in Vietnam and was awarded the Navy Cross, the Silver Star, two Bronze Stars and two Purple Hearts.

Altruism necessary for democracy, freedom and successful countries

Later, Webb worked in Congress in veterans’ affairs and rose through the ranks of the Defense Department. In 1987 he was named secretary of the Navy. Webb served in the U.S. Senate from 2007 to 2013 and made veterans’ issues a priority while remaining focused on foreign affairs.

In 2009, Webb made a trip to Myanmar to help secure the release of an American prisoner. He served as chairman of the Foreign Relations Committee’s Asia-Pacific subcommittee and was a strong supporter of reforming the criminal justice system.

Webb argues that drug addiction should be treated as a medical rather than criminal concern.

Like others who have served in the military during wartime, Webb believes war is a last resort, not an initial imperative, especially against countries which have not attacked us. He staunchly opposed the Iraq war from the beginning.

Webb warned in 2002, before the war began, that “those who are pushing for a unilateral war in Iraq know full well that there is no exit strategy if we invade.”

In his announcement message, Webb presented his differences with the rest of the field as his primary strength:

I understand the odds, particularly in today’s political climate, where fair debate is so often drowned out by huge sums of money. Let’s clean out the manure-filled stables of a political system that has been characterized by greed.

He reminded voters that he has spent his “entire life in and around the military” and reiterated his early and passionate opposition to the Iraq war and his subsequent opposition to intervention in Libya, both policies supported by his Democratic opponent, Hillary Clinton.

Politics then and now: Hillary Clinton and the Founding Fathers

Webb declared:

We need a president who understands leadership, who has a proven record of actual accomplishments, who can bring about bipartisan solutions, who can bring people from both sides to the table to get things done.

Jim Webb is not the candidate of the Democratic Party establishment, which is financed by elites on Wall Street and in Hollywood. Hillary Clinton is their favorite and has long done their bidding. In a world increasingly heading for chaos, a war hero with international experience might have widespread appeal, especially one who is not trigger-happy. Webb says he feels an obligation to provide the leadership necessary to keep the U.S. out of foreign entanglements and to fight for middle class Americans:

We need to shake the hold of these shadow elites on our political process. Our elected officials need to get back to the basics of good governance and to remember that their principal obligations are to protect our national interests abroad and to ensure a level playing field here at home, especially for those who otherwise have no voice in the corridors of power.

Webb points to Hillary Clinton’s vote for the Iraq war in the Senate and her strong advocacy at the State Department for U.S. military support of rebels who overthrew Libyan dictator Muammar Gaddafi, which destabilized the country and helped give rise to ISIS, the spread of terrorism and the complete destabilization of the Middle East.

“Let me assure you,” he said in his announcement, “as president I would not have urged an invasion of Iraq, nor as senator would I have voted to authorize it. I warned in writing five months before that invasion that we do not belong as an occupying power in that part of the world, and that this invasion would be a strategic blunder of historic proportions, empowering Iran and in the long run China, unleashing sectarian violence inside Iraq and turning our troops into terrorist targets.

Hillary Clinton is a flawed candidate. The main thing she seems to  stand for is being elected president. She would not even take a position on the trade bill, which she once supported. She and her husband have become rich through politics. Evidence  shows that her efforts to provide favors to major donors to her husband’s foundation stretch back to her time as a U.S. senator, when she had the power to earmark federal funds and influence legislation.

The Clinton Global slush fund

For example, public records show that she introduced a bill in the Senate that allowed a donor to the Clinton Foundation to use tax-exempt bonds to build a shopping center in Syracuse, N.Y. She also worked to defeat legislation that would have subjected Freddie Mac, the mortgage giant, to tougher regulations before the housing bubble burst and led to a major recession. That same year, Freddie Mac donated $50,000 to $100,000 to the then-named William J. Clinton Foundation.

There are pages filled with similar instances of the Clintons enriching themselves and violating the public trust.

Because Hillary Clinton is so flawed, her challenger on the left, Sen. Bernje Sanders, I-Vt., is within 8 percentage points of Clinton in New Hampshire polls. Sanders is viewed as a principled liberal, and, while many of his positions may seem a bit  extreme to many voters, someone who stands for something seems preferable to someone who stands for nothing but personal ambition and enrichment.

Now Jim Webb has entered the contest.

Webb brings a different set of experiences and a long career in public service. He was busy writing books while Hillary Clinton was enriching herself by serving special interests, both foreign and domestic. In 2006, Webb was not expected to defeat incumbent Republican Sen. George Allen, R-Va., but he did.

Larry J. Sabato, director of the University of Virginia’s Center for Politics, says, “Webb is an interesting and accomplished guy, and as he proved in 2006. You underestimate him at your peril.”

Jim Webb brings a lifetime of bravery, experience and thoughtful leadership to the race. He certainly deserves a hearing.  Hopefully, he will get it.  And in the presidential debates, Hillary Clinton may finally have to explain herself.

Some women may vote for her on the basis of gender, but many will not.  After hearing  Jim Webb and Bernie Sanders, naked ambition may not seem very appealing to voters.

Click here for reuse options!
Copyright 2015 Communities Digital News

This article is the copyrighted property of the writer and Communities Digital News, LLC. Written permission must be obtained before reprint in online or print media. REPRINTING CONTENT WITHOUT PERMISSION AND/OR PAYMENT IS THEFT AND PUNISHABLE BY LAW.

Correspondingly, Communities Digital News, LLC uses its best efforts to operate in accordance with the Fair Use Doctrine under US Copyright Law and always tries to provide proper attribution. If you have reason to believe that any written material or image has been innocently infringed, please bring it to the immediate attention of CDN via the e-mail address or phone number listed on the Contact page so that it can be resolved expeditiously.

Allan C. Brownfeld
Received B.A. from the College of William and Mary, J.D. from the Marshall-Wythe School of Law of the College of William and Mary, and M.A. from the University of Maryland. Served as a member of the faculties of St. Stephen's Episcopal School, Alexandria, Virginia and the University College of the University of Maryland. The recipient of a Wall Street Journal Foundation Award, he has written for such newspapers as The Houston Press, The Washington Evening Star, The Richmond Times Dispatch, and The Cincinnati Enquirer. His column appeared for many years in Roll Call, the newspaper of Capitol Hill. His articles have appeared in The Yale Review, The Texas Quarterly, Orbis, Modern Age, The Michigan Quarterly, The Commonweal and The Christian Century. His essays have been reprinted in a number of text books for university courses in Government and Politics. For many years, his column appeared several times a week in papers such as The Washington Times, The Phoenix Gazette and the Orange County Register. He served as a member of the staff of the U.S. Senate Internal Security Subcommittee, as Assistant to the research director of the House Republican Conference and as a consultant to members of the U.S. Congress and to the Vice President. He is the author of five books and currently serves as Contributing Editor of The St. Croix Review, Associate Editor of The Lincoln Review and editor of Issues.