Netanyahu's hard right position is not the best deal
WASHINGTON, March 18, 2014 – Benjamin Netanyahu has won reelection as the Israeli prime minister. On Monday, in an effort to bolster his position, he declared that on his watch there would never be a Palestinian state.
Among other things, he declared, “I think that anyone who is going to establish a Palestinian state and evacuate lands is giving attack grounds to radical Islam against the state of Israel.”
Although Netanyahu expressed support for a two-state solution in 2009, an effort to placate the U.S. and the world, he clearly didn’t mean it. He opposed the Oslo Accords.
Mrs. Rabin still holds that position today. By rejecting a Palestinian state, Netanyahu is returning to his traditional position.
A key U.S. goal in the region under every administration, Republican or Democratic, has been to end the Israeli occupation of the West Bank and create a Palestinian state, the so-called “two-state” solution.
The United States views this as not only a just resolution for both Israelis and Palestinians, but also as a way to counter Islamic extremism, which is growing in the region. According to anecdotal reporting, some individuals who join ISIS and al-Qaeda are motivated by what they see as mistreatment of Palestinians in the occupied territories.
Israel, it seems is increasingly pursuing policies counter to U.S. interests in the region. At the same time, U.S. taxpayers provide enormous funding to Israel.
While Israel proclaims itself a democracy, the nearly four million Palestinians on the West Bank have no right to vote at all. Their neighbors in the burgeoning Jewish settlements, illegal by international law, vote in Israeli elections.
Another U.S. goal in the region is for Iran to rejoin the community of nations and abandon any plans for nuclear weapons.
Benjamin Netanyahu has openly opposed any nuclear deal between Iran and the rest of the world. In an unprecedented interference in U.S. politics, Netanyahu called President Obama naive and accused him of preparing to sign a “bad” agreement. As Iran and the rest of the world are in the process of negotiating the agreement, Netanyahu had no way of knowing what any final agreement might include.
Netanyahu’s apparent solution: war with Iran, a country that has not attacked us and has not attacked Israel.
In 2002, Netanyahu testified before Congress advocating a military assault against Iraq. AIPAC, the self-proclaimed “pro-Israel” lobbying group, which often appears to act as an unregistered agent of the Israeli government, vigorously promoted war with Iraq in 2002. The group is now calling for confrontation with Iran.
Israel is the largest recipient of U.S. taxpayer dollars in our history. From 1949 to 2008, the U.S. government provided Israel more than $103.6 billion of total official aid, making it the largest recipient of U.S. foreign assistance in the post-World War II era. In 2007, the two countries signed a memorandum of understanding providing for $30 billion of U.S. military aid from 2009 to 2018. Between FY 2000 and 2009, the U.S. gave Israel $24.1 billion of military aid. With this taxpayer money, the U.S. licensed, paid for and delivered more than 670 million weapons and related equipment to Israel, including almost 500 categories of weapons.
In return for this massive aid, the Israeli government has rejected U.S. calls for an end to illegal settlements in the occupied territories. It has blatantly interfered in U.S. domestic political life, promoting a war in which Americans, not Israelis, would die, and is now pushing the U.S. to war again.
Israel is taking these actions with the help of its well-financed American lobby. One of the major contributors to that lobby, the casino magnate Sheldon Adelson, once lamented that while he once served in the U.S. Army, he wished he had served in the Israeli Army. And now Benjamin Netanyahu has proclaimed that no Palestinian state would be established while he holds power.
Netanyahu knows no bounds.
In the face of terrorist attacks in Paris and Copenhagen, he called upon French and Danish Jews to abandon their countries and emigrate to Israel. He was sharply rebuked by, among others, the chief rabbis of France and Denmark.
Before he came to Washington to address Congress, he said that he spoke for all the Jews of the world, not only for Israelis who had elected him. Sen. Diane Feinstein, D-Calif., declared, “He does not speak for me.” She called his claim to speak for men and women who were citizens of other countries “arrogant,” as did other respected Jewish voices around the world.
Israel’s policies are not only a threat to American interests in the Middle East, but to Jewish values as well.
Rabbi Brant Rosen, one of the founders of Jewish Voice For Peace, laments, “The State of Israel is now the living embodiment of Judaism as empire. It demonstrates, all too tragically, the consequences of this quasi-Faustian bargain we have made with political nationalism. The Jewish people, for centuries the victims of empire and the guardians of a sacred tradition that promoted a spiritual alternative to the veneration of human power, has betrayed its unique spiritual vision in favor of idolatrous nation-statism and militarism.”
Rabbi Rosen, and an increasing number of American Jewish voices urge a rejection of nationalism and a return to Judaism’s traditional religious values.
“Affirming, as 1 Samuel would have it, that the overweening desire for national power is itself a kind of idolatry and a turning away from God. It would mean responding to national tragedy as the rabbis did: with the affirmation that mighty empires may come and go, but the Jewish people have survived because we have affirmed a transcendent power much greater than any human power. And, conversely, it would affirm that when we put our faith in the power of empire, we may well be sowing the seeds of our own destruction.”
By voting for Benjamin Netanyahu, particularly just after he rejected the establishment of a Palestinian state, Israeli voters have sent us a message.
Sadly, they seem not to be interested in democratic values when it comes to Palestinians. They have turned their backs on the humane Jewish tradition of treating all men and women equally. This, as voters in a sovereign state, is their right.
But if Israeli voters reject American advice, values and policy goals in the region, why do they not reject our financial aid as well? And American taxpayers must ask why, in the face of Netanyahu’s contempt for our own government, we should continue to finance his.
If ever there was a time for Americans to re-think their relationship with Israel, that time seems to be now.Click here for reuse options!
Copyright 2015 Communities Digital News
This article is the copyrighted property of the writer and Communities Digital News, LLC. Written permission must be obtained before reprint in online or print media. REPRINTING CONTENT WITHOUT PERMISSION AND/OR PAYMENT IS THEFT AND PUNISHABLE BY LAW.
Correspondingly, Communities Digital News, LLC uses its best efforts to operate in accordance with the Fair Use Doctrine under US Copyright Law and always tries to provide proper attribution. If you have reason to believe that any written material or image has been innocently infringed, please bring it to the immediate attention of CDN via the e-mail address or phone number listed on the Contact page so that it can be resolved expeditiously.