Conyers and Wilson introduce the American Full Employment Caucus

Conyers and Wilson introduce the American Full Employment Caucus

by -
0 1028
Unemployment rate down, so where are all the jobs? / Image:

WASHINGTON, February 15, 2014 — There are several signs in the House of Representatives that indicate that Members of Congress are taking seriously the call to create quality employment for Americans. This is a good thing and something that America needs to see more of, especially with 50 million Americans still living in poverty and another 100 million living in low-income.

With record income inequality in this country, we clearly have some work to do.

Last week witnessed the creation of a Full Employment Caucus, co-founded and co-chaired by U.S. Reps. John Conyers, D-Mich., and Frederica Wilson, D-Fla., to, in their words, discuss “proven job-creation proposals and implement strategies for their adoption.” The end result would “strengthen America’s economy and restore dignity for the tens of millions of Americans who have suffered the physical and emotional pain of joblessness.”

Now that’s a patriotic play by our policymakers. Let’s hope it builds momentum quickly in the House.

Given that America has 30 million of its citizens unemployed or underemployed, this is a noble task and one that’s worth taking up. Conyers and Wilson believe that employment is a human right. It certainly is an essential component of improving one’s capacity to fulfill basic human needs, like providing shelter, food, autonomy and security for one’s family. 

These are the necessary ingredients and essential foundation for any American dream, however elusive it remains for millions of Americans. 

Equally important, from an economist’s or policymaker’s perspective, are the benefits that come from a fully employed America. Higher numbers in the workforce mean higher wages and higher purchasing power — and ultimately higher economic productivity. Businesses understand this better than most, as do law enforcement officials across the country.

Americans who have quality employment, which includes a living wage, are able to spend in the economy above and beyond their basic needs. Beyond putting food on the table and paying rent, Americans who are making a sufficient salary can do more for their family than just the basic buys, a trend which U.S. manufacturers will certainly merit.

Beyond business, individuals and communities that have higher standards of living are witnessing less violence. There is a strong correlation between poverty, inequality, poor education and economic opportunity, low social mobility and violence. That’s no surprise. It doesn’t mean that poor people are inherently violent, not in the slightest. But when you’ve got your basic needs taken care of, you’re much less likely to give all that up and risk arrest for a petty crime or misdemeanor.

When educational achievement and economic opportunity is readily available, the incentives for legitimate engagement in society are greater. Conyers and Wilson get that.

Representatives Tony Cardenas, D-Calif., and Mick Mulvaney, R-S.C., are introducing the “American Worker Mobility Act,” this month, to ensure that America’s unemployed workers have the support they need to find quality employment, which often requires relocation. According to Cardenas and Mulvaney, the relocation subsidy that the Department of Labor is scheduled to release, will help Americans relocate within the U.S. “at least 60 miles from the individual’s current residence, for the purpose of attaining employment.” The assistance will be available to any American individual who “has obtained a bona fide offer of suitable employment affording a reasonable expectation of long-term duration in the area in which the individual wishes to relocate.”  

The legislation also applies to American workers who wish to relocate from an area of high unemployment to an area of low unemployment.  This is exactly what unemployed workers need.

From the macro to the micro, Conyers, Wilson, Cardenas and Mulvaney are tackling the essential components required to get America back to work. We need both efforts. From thinking big about bringing America to full employment, with less than 4 percent unemployed, to caring for the day-to-day concerns of workers who may have to move their entire family to another state to obtain a quality job, this is what foresighted members of Congress think about and, ultimately, legislate. 

We have plenty of work waiting for the unemployed and the underemployed in America; it’s merely a matter of prioritizing it. The $3.6 trillion needed, for example, to bring our roads, bridges and infrastructure up to safety standards, according to the American Society of Civil Engineers, after being neglected for over 30 years, is a great place to start. 

America has the money. Remember that we’re spending $4-6 trillion on the Afghanistan and Iraq wars after we take care of all the returning soldiers. Thus, any member of Congress who says we don’t have the federal funds to create American jobs is being disingenuous and doing a disservice to our workers who want to return to the workforce. 

The time for prioritizing just jobs in America is long past due. These members of Congress get that.  And thank goodness. We can no longer keep American workers waiting. 

Click here for reuse options!
Copyright 2014 Communities Digital News

This article is the copyrighted property of the writer and Communities Digital News, LLC. Written permission must be obtained before reprint in online or print media. REPRINTING CONTENT WITHOUT PERMISSION AND/OR PAYMENT IS THEFT AND PUNISHABLE BY LAW.

Correspondingly, Communities Digital News, LLC uses its best efforts to operate in accordance with the Fair Use Doctrine under US Copyright Law and always tries to provide proper attribution. If you have reason to believe that any written material or image has been innocently infringed, please bring it to the immediate attention of CDN via the e-mail address or phone number listed on the Contact page so that it can be resolved expeditiously.

Michael Shank
Michael Shank, Ph.D., is the Director of Foreign Policy at the Friends Committee on National Legislation in Washington DC. Michael is also Adjunct Faculty and a Board Member at George Mason University's School for Conflict Analysis and Resolution, Board Member at Communities Without Boundaries International, Senior Fellow at the French American Global Forum and the Just Jobs Network, and Associate at the Global Partnership for the Prevention of Armed Conflict. Prior to joining FCNL, Michael served for four years as a congressional staffer, working as US Congressman Michael Honda's Senior Policy Advisor and Communications Director. Michael's career over the past 20 years has involved UN, government and non-governmental organizations in the US, Europe, Middle East, Asia, Africa and Latin America, as an adviser on diplomatic, economic, energy, and environmental security and policy initiatives. Michael's Ph.D. from George Mason University's School for Conflict Analysis and Resolution focused on Climate Conflict.