A coin toss: Hillary’s Iowa victory

A coin toss: Hillary’s Iowa victory

Hillary won a couple of caucus precincts and delegates by coin tosses. Bernie Sanders might want to triple-check those coins and get his people to toss them.

WASHINGTON, February 2, 2016 — An account from AD 400 tells of Roman children playing a game called capita aut navia (“heads or ships”). The ships referred to the image of boats on the flip-side of the ancient coin.

When brothers Orville and Wilbur Wright decided which of them would make the first controlled and sustained flight of a heavier-than-air machine, they did so with a coin toss.

In the 1950s, a coin flip earned rock-and-roller Ritchie Valens a seat aboard the ill-fated charter plane that crashed in a cornfield, ending his life and that of fellow performers Buddy Holly and “The Big Bopper” Jiles Perry Richardson.

But a study released by the University of British Columbia says coin-toss results aren’t as random as your might think.

“When participants are given simple instructions about how to manipulate the toss of a coin and only a few minutes to practice this technique, more than half can significantly manipulate the outcome,” said researchers Matthew Clark and Brian Westerberg.

In a squeaker finale to Iowa’s Democratic caucuses, presidential candidate Hillary Clinton received 49.9 percent of the vote to Sen. Bernie Sanders’ 49.6 percent.

According to the Des Moines Register, “In a handful of Democratic caucus precincts Monday, a delegate was awarded with a coin toss … in Ames, where supporters of candidates Bernie Sanders and Hillary Clinton disputed the results after 60 caucus participants apparently disappeared from the proceedings … As a result of the coin toss, Clinton was awarded an additional delegate.”

The story adds that on several occasions, “the Sanders campaign challenged the results and precinct leaders called a Democratic Party hot line set up to advise on such situations.”

“Party officials recommended they settle the dispute with a coin toss,” said the Register.

According to the New York Times, “Democrats backing Hillary Clinton, nervously eyeing Senator Bernie Sanders’s growing strength in the early nominating states, are turning to a new strategy to raise doubts about his candidacy, highlighting his socialist beliefs to warn that he would be an electoral disaster who would frighten swing voters and send Democrats in tight congressional and governor’s races to defeat.”

Or, failing that, when the vote is close, forgo tedious recounts and leave the final decision to a random coin toss.

But is it random?

“Certain people are able to successfully manipulate the toss of a coin,” concludes the University of British Columbia study. “This throws into doubt the validity of using a coin toss to determine a chance result.”

“Nothing is as obnoxious as other people’s luck,” said F. Scott Fitzgerald.

If you don’t believe him, just ask Bernie.

Click here for reuse options!
Copyright 2016 Communities Digital News

This article is the copyrighted property of the writer and Communities Digital News, LLC. Written permission must be obtained before reprint in online or print media. REPRINTING CONTENT WITHOUT PERMISSION AND/OR PAYMENT IS THEFT AND PUNISHABLE BY LAW.

Correspondingly, Communities Digital News, LLC uses its best efforts to operate in accordance with the Fair Use Doctrine under US Copyright Law and always tries to provide proper attribution. If you have reason to believe that any written material or image has been innocently infringed, please bring it to the immediate attention of CDN via the e-mail address or phone number listed on the Contact page so that it can be resolved expeditiously.