Recently while attending to life’s reality of viewings and funerals, many songs and lyrics repeated through car speakers and in my head as I took a sentimental trip down memory lane. Finding the right words to say when going through a funeral’s receiving line can be quite difficult.
The lyrics above from Simon and Garfunkel’s song, Homeward Bound, continued to resonate.
How many times have you found yourself asking family and friends from across the years: “Why don’t we get together more often? This has been so much fun, we should do this again soon.”?
Unfortunately for most, it is more typical than not that as more responsibilities, priorities, and distractions fill our lives, things and people from our past get pushed out of the picture. It’s reality and often it’s unavoidable.
At this point, you may be wondering how I’ll bridge the gap over into a beer conversation but, hold on, here goes…
The same thought process can be applied to a lifetime of drinking beer when thinking back over past “relationships” with beer. What did I drink in my early formative years of beer drinking? What did I like? What did I drink just for a buzz? What did I think tasted good…tasted interesting…tasted different? How have my taste and personal preferences changed? What do I no longer enjoy?
If you have been drinking beer for more than a few years, you likely have gone through this evolution as well. With those thoughts in mind, I went to the grocery store to see what I could find that I typically overlook in search of something new, different, and/or interesting.
I picked up nine beers that have played some part in the early years of my beer drinking and appreciation.
Other than being beers that I no longer typically drink, there was not much rhyme nor reason to selecting these beers other than they were available for sale as single units on the retailer’s shelf. I list them out here for you below with some brief notes. The only order, by the way, that they are in is alphabetical.
Amstel Light– This was the thinnest, most water-like, beer on the table. It had an unfortunate slight metallic taste to it. At 95 calories, it at least has that going for it for those concerned with calorie-counting. On the other hand, I have drunk fresh Amstel (not Light) overseas on its home turf in the past and found it rather tasty.
Bass– After all of these years, this is still a pleasant drinking English Ale, if not a tad too sweet for my liking. That reminds me I’d like to track down John Courage and see what I would think almost twenty years later.
Guinness Draught and Extra Stout– The “meal in a glass” thing? At 125 calories, the Guinness Draught is not nearly as filling as many believe it to be. With the widget in the bottle, it certainly does deliver the creamy softness as when served on nitrogen draft. The Extra Stout version does weigh in a bit beefier at 176 calories and carries just a tinge more hoppiness. In both cases, this has always been, and continues to be, a very easy-drinking roasty stout.
Molson Canadian– Put it up there, I suppose, with the Mooseheads and Becks of the world that I used to think were important to have in my fridge. Tasting this nowadays, I can’t imagine why I ever liked this beer. It had the ever-so-tiniest hint of noticeable malt, but not much else.
Pilsner Urquell– To begin with I might note that a true Czech Pilsener can only originate from the town of Pilsen in the Czech Republic. All others are referred to as Pilsner-style; notice the subtle spelling difference. This beer ranked surprisingly as one of my favorites on the table during this sampling session. It smelled and tasted like I just walked into a brewpub and the brewers were beginning their brew day with grains in the brew kettle. It definitely had a bigger hop presence than I recall in my early days of drinking this beer. But, then again, it’s been so long since I’ve ordered and drank this beer that I probably don’t accurately recall much about this beer. This has definitely moved up my list of beers to try again soon.
Samuel Smith Nut Brown Ale– I can’t recall whether the traditionally clear bottles from this English brewery ever resulted in a skunked beer for me. Between the clear bottle and the lengthy trip from brewery to U.S. retail shelves, it would not be unexpected. Fortunately, the Nut Brown Ale that I sampled for this column presented itself in a brown bottle and unscathed. How did it stack up? It’s still as roasty and pleasant of a brown ale as I recall and would gladly have another.
Yuengling Lager and Lord Chesterfield Ale – Here in Pennsylvania, we’ve been the envy of the beer drinking world ever since Yuengling took on an almost cult-like status fifteen, or so, years ago. Was it the unique name? I’m not quite sure, but I never took much of a liking to the flagship beer, simply called Lager. And that opinion still holds today. All I wrote on my tasting notes was simply “Nothing”. As in, I got absolutely nothing from this beer. I’ll admit I was a bit surprised by this reaction as I certainly did not expect such a vapid beer. Lord Chesterfield, however, was a totally different story. This beer, the Porter, and the Black ‘n’ Tan from Yuengling were three of my early favorites from this Pottsville-based brewery. This particular tasting I did was from a can and it served up a real pleasantly balanced beer with just a little extra kick of hops to keep things interesting.
As you continue to search out ever-newer and ever-more-different beers, I recommend not losing touch with some of the beers that helped to shape the basis of what you know today about beer. You may be surprised, as was I, when revisiting these beers that it more often has been we that have changed, not the beer.
Bryan J. Kolesar travels the world for great beer and food. He writes from his native Philadelphia region. Kolesar’s writing can be found here in Communities Digital News, at his popular long-running blog – The Brew Lounge, and followed on Facebook (@TheBrewLounge) and Twitter (@BrewLounge).Click here for reuse options!
Copyright 2014 Communities Digital News
This article is the copyrighted property of the writer and Communities Digital News, LLC. Written permission must be obtained before reprint in online or print media. REPRINTING CONTENT WITHOUT PERMISSION AND/OR PAYMENT IS THEFT AND PUNISHABLE BY LAW.
Correspondingly, Communities Digital News, LLC uses its best efforts to operate in accordance with the Fair Use Doctrine under US Copyright Law and always tries to provide proper attribution. If you have reason to believe that any written material or image has been innocently infringed, please bring it to the immediate attention of CDN via the e-mail address or phone number listed on the Contact page so that it can be resolved expeditiously.