The History of Religious Liberty: Why religious liberty matters

In 16th-century England you could be arrested and hanged for hosting home Bible study, and fealty to the king meant fealty to the king's church. Today, must your conscience match Obama's?

The History of Religious Liberty by Michael Farris


COLORADO SPRINGS, Colo., May 18, 2016 — Across the street, a large number of cars were parked in front of a neighbors’ house. It’s a quiet street, but the neighbor and his wife are very religious people who regularly hold Bible studies in their home.

Michael Farris points out in The History of Religious Liberty: from Tyndale to Madison, that in 16th and 17th century England, such gatherings were illegal. For holding them, or even attending, people could be arrested, fined, imprisoned or even burned at the stake for heresy, depending on what was said and who ruled England at the time.

That is almost inconceivable to modern Americans. Religious liberty is at the very foundation of our country.

Does religious freedom include the freedom to discriminate?

In medieval Europe, the Church ruled the spiritual lives of the people and the State was its enforcement arm. Faith, religion, and even the Bible itself were what the Church said they were. Only the clergy, trained in Greek and Latin and perhaps Hebrew, could read the Bible.

In 1517, that changed. The Augustinian monk Martin Luther nailed a set of 95 Theses to the church door in Wittenberg, Germany detailing abuses of the Church and igniting the Protestant Reformation. He translated the Bible into vernacular German, and the invention of the printing press helped it to spread.

Farris doesn’t start his story with Luther; he starts it with William Tyndale, who, beginning in the 1520s, sought to bring the Bible to the ploughboys of England.

For Tyndale to achieve his goal of giving the Bible to ploughboys, according to Farris, the worlds of religion, law, and politics would all have to dramatically change.

And change they did, slowly, over the next two centuries in England.

As Farris tells it, this is a tale of the kings and queens of England: of Henry VIII and his break with the Catholic Church; of “Bloody Mary,” who earned her reputation by burning Protestant dissenters at the stake. It’s the story of James I, who, almost unwittingly, ordered an “official” translation of the Bible into English—the 1615 King James Bible.

Throughout this time and until the Glorious Revolution of 1688, the approved religion was what the monarch said it was. The church in England, led by the Archbishop of Canterbury, had the monarch as its formal head.

This is what is meant by “an establishment of religion.” To hold public office, one had to take a loyalty oath not only to the crown, but also to the church.

The relationship of church and state was that spiritual matters belonged to the church and the police power belonged to the state. If the church declared someone a heretic, it was the duty of the state to punish that person.

Everyone in England believed that every person in the realm should be a member of the official church; they just disagreed on what that church should be. (Jews had been banned from England for several centuries.) Everyone was expected to attend church every Sunday or face consequences. Home meetings were banned, for only the educated clergy were considered fit to teach.

Puritans felt this way as much as Anglicans, Presbyterians and Catholics did.

Farris describes who the accession of William and Mary in 1688 established, once and for all, Protestantism as the national religion of England, soon to become Great Britain. The Anglican Church, however, was no more tolerant of Baptists, Methodists, Puritans, Anabaptists, Quakers or others than it had been prior to their reign. And even toleration is not liberty.

Judge Collyer rules in favor of Obamacare challenge

These and others came to the New World for the freedom to practice their religions. We should never forget that many of the colonies were founded by those seeking religious freedom: freedom of conscience.

Freedom of conscience is the freedom to believe what you want in matters of religion and to exercise those beliefs. Yet even in the New World, those religious refugees set up their colonies with established religions. Massachusetts was for Puritans (later Congregationalists), Maryland for Catholics, Virginia for Anglicans, Rhode Island for Baptists, Pennsylvania for Quakers.

Why should 21st century Americans care about what happened more than two hundred years ago? Wasn’t the question of religious liberty settled long ago?


In modern America, religious liberty is again in danger. When florists, bakers, photographers and wedding venues can be forced by the government either to serve and support homosexual marriage ceremonies that they consider sinful or be driven bankrupt, they do not have religious liberty.

While the story of Tyndale opens Farris’ book, Madison’s fight for religious liberty closes it.

We have a bill of rights today because the Anti-Federalists insisted on it as a condition of ratifying the Constitution. James Madison saw to it that the Bill of Rights was passed by the first Congress.

The very first right is the right of religious liberty: not mere tolerance, but liberty as a natural right.

That right, articulated in the First Amendment, was upheld on Monday by the Supreme Court which unanimously ruled that the government cannot fine the Little Sisters of the Poor for not violating their conscience by participating in Obamacare’s abortion mandate.

Farris’ book tells us why that was such an important victory.

The History of Religious Liberty: from Tyndale to Madison, by Michael Farris. Master Books; Student edition (April 30, 2015). 372 pages. ISBN-13: 978-0890518823

Click here for reuse options!
Copyright 2016 Communities Digital News

• The views expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of the editors or management of Communities Digital News.

This article is the copyrighted property of the writer and Communities Digital News, LLC. Written permission must be obtained before reprint in online or print media. REPRINTING CONTENT WITHOUT PERMISSION AND/OR PAYMENT IS THEFT AND PUNISHABLE BY LAW.

Correspondingly, Communities Digital News, LLC uses its best efforts to operate in accordance with the Fair Use Doctrine under US Copyright Law and always tries to provide proper attribution. If you have reason to believe that any written material or image has been innocently infringed, please bring it to the immediate attention of CDN via the e-mail address or phone number listed on the Contact page so that it can be resolved expeditiously.