Examining the death penalty as currently imposed across the world leaves one glad to be living in the U.S. Nonetheless, the death penalty is still wrong.
WASHINGTON, March 27, 2016 — The debate about putting someone to death for committing a crime is an issue often raised in criminal justice conversations.
Regardless of which side of the discussion we take, we Americans have some sense as to which crimes are appropriate for death penalty consideration. Our laws and our public view is that murder is on that short list. Contrast our view with others around the world. Others elsewhere view life differently, sometimes considerably so.
For example, there are people and countries that applaud and encourage suicide bombings. It is not hard to understand, then, where they may be coming from when an individual does something they consider criminal.
While the list of countries that allow and use the death penalty continues to decrease — as of July, 2015, according to Amnesty International (AI), 140 countries have legally abolished the death penalty or have effectively abolished it despite laws still on the books — what, in some countries, constitutes a crime that can trigger the death sentence is frequently unfathomable.
In the United States of America, being involved in the death of another person is almost a de facto prerequisite for getting the death penalty. Another death penalty crime is treason, which remains on the books in the federal system and in some states as well.
Everyone in the U.S. who has been executed since the death penalty was reinstated in 1976 participated in a crime in which at least one victim died. In most of these cases, the individual executed directly killed the victim. A small number of death sentences have been carried out where the defendant ordered or contracted with another person to carry out a murder. Some death sentences have been carried out where the person executed participated in a felony during which a victim died at the hands of another participant in the felony.
Elsewhere around the world:
- Death sentences can follow convictions for homosexuality in Afghanistan, Brunei, Iran, Iraq, Nigeria, Saudi Arabia, Somalia, Sudan, the United Arab Emirates and Yemen.
- Convictions for perjury and treason can result in death sentences in Algeria, Bahamas, Bangladesh, Barbados, Belarus, Botswana, Central African Republic, Cuba, Egypt, Ethiopia, Ghana, Guyana, Israel (high treason), Japan, Kenya, Laos, Libya, Nauru, North Korea, New Guinea, Peru, Saint Lucia, Sierra Leon, Singapore, South Sudan, Sudan, Swaziland, Syria, Tanzania, Tonga, Trinidad and Tobago, United Arab Emirates, the United States, Vietnam and Zambia.
- A conviction for espionage can result in death in Algeria, Cameroon, Central African Republic, Iran, Peru, Qatar, the United States, Vietnam and Syria.
- Corruption is a death penalty crime in China, Cuba and Iran.
- Fraud is a death penalty offense in China and Vietnam.
- Stealing something can get you executed in Algeria, North Korea, Saudi Arabia and Syria.
- Adultery can result in the death penalty in Brunei, Saudi Arabia, Somalia, Yemen and Syria.
- A woman and her two daughters are being held in Papua, New Guinea on charges of sorcery. The death sentence may follow if they are convicted.
- Last November a Saudi Arabian court sentenced a Palestinian poet to death for apostasy, defined as the act of abandoning his Muslim faith.
- Saudi Arabia (AI reports) continues to impose the death sentence on individuals under the age of 18, violating child human rights laws.
But the death sentence cannot be justified.
- Around the world, some countries with absurdly unfair justice systems (such as China, Iran, Iraq) employ the death sentence after conducting unfair trials, when “confessions” are extracted through torture, and to punish political opponents. The death penalty in such countries is often used as a tool of repression, a quick way to silence political opposition. Frequently, those accused do not have lawyers representing them.
- It is discriminatory, particularly in the United States, when being poor or being a member of an ethnic or a religious minority is much more likely to result in a death sentence. This fact is the result of still blatant discrimination as well societal factors. Poor people and those in marginalized groups have less access to the legal resources that are necessary for them to defend themselves.
Amnesty International keeps statistics on executions around the world. They rank China the most prolific state executioner, despite the Chinese government’s efforts to suppress the numbers. AI uses media sources and human rights groups, rather than official government sources to estimate the number of executions in China.
Executions in China can follow convictions for drug trafficking and for other offenses that would not trigger death sentences in the U.S. Apparently China does not discriminate by class, according to AI. Recently a billionaire was executed for running a criminal gang.
AI statistics place Iran, Iraq and Saudi Arabia in second to fourth places in number of annual executions worldwide last year. The U.S. is currently number five.
Beyond the debate about whether the death penalty should be allowed, many states in this country are struggling with the method of execution. The supply of lethal drugs, limited now for many years for a number of reasons, has resulted in consideration of alternate methods of execution, which could be used if lethal injections are ruled unconstitutional or if a state cannot obtain the necessary drugs.
As for other methods under consideration, the Mississippi House wants to use firing squads. Oklahoma would pursue electrocution or a firing squad. Wyoming would use the gas chamber, and Tennessee would use electrocution. Utah is the only state that has executed three men by firing squad, the most recent example occurring in 2010.
Countries that do execute individuals they define as “criminals” employ methods we Americans would never consider: beheading, shooting in the back of the head and hanging. Saudi Arabia has conducted an execution by crucifixion.
Has anyone asked the current crop of presidential candidates if they would support a death penalty ban?
To take a life when a life has been lost is revenge, not justice. —Desmond Tutu
Paul A. Samakow is an attorney licensed in Maryland and Virginia, and has been practicing since 1980. He represents injury victims and routinely battles insurance companies and big businesses that will not accept full responsibility for the harms and losses they cause. He can be reached at any time by calling 1-866-SAMAKOW (1-866-726-2569), via email, or through his website.
His book “The 8 Critical Things Your Auto Accident Attorney Won’t Tell You” can be instantly downloaded, for free, on his website: http://www.samakowlaw.com/book.Click here for reuse options!
Copyright 2016 Communities Digital News
This article is the copyrighted property of the writer and Communities Digital News, LLC. Written permission must be obtained before reprint in online or print media. REPRINTING CONTENT WITHOUT PERMISSION AND/OR PAYMENT IS THEFT AND PUNISHABLE BY LAW.
Correspondingly, Communities Digital News, LLC uses its best efforts to operate in accordance with the Fair Use Doctrine under US Copyright Law and always tries to provide proper attribution. If you have reason to believe that any written material or image has been innocently infringed, please bring it to the immediate attention of CDN via the e-mail address or phone number listed on the Contact page so that it can be resolved expeditiously.