WASHINGTON, October 26, 2016 – In a signature event this morning in the nation’s capital, Donald Trump was on hand to cut the ribbon for the official Grand Opening of his glittering Trump International Hotel.
This latest addition to Trump’s line of luxury hotels marks one of his signature business achievements.
Trump has managed to renovate and repurpose one of Washington’s most historic downtown buildings—the majestic Old Post Office Building on Pennsylvania Avenue, just four blocks from the White House he hopes to occupy soon—as a first class hotel, restaurant and meeting complex, doing it on time and under budget. In addition, he’s saved this once-decaying landmark to serve the city’s residents and guests in a new century.
Typically, however, political operatives attempted to disrupt the scene, apparently unsatisfied with the recent but ultimately unsuccessful efforts of graffiti “artists” to deface the main entrance of the building.
In a report leading up to today’s ribbon-cutting event, The Examiner reported
“Labor and liberal leaders aligned against Donald Trump‘s presidential campaign are calling for ‘angry protesters’ to disrupt the businessman’s grand opening of the Washington Trump International Hotel four blocks from the White House.
“Armed with a new critical ad, MoveOn.org, For Our Future and the Culinary Workers Union are planning a demonstration urging the public to boycott Trump’s properties. The groups say that the chain of luxury hotels mistreats workers.”
No surprise here. Left-wing “protestors”—actually, political operatives—are perpetually angry and always looking to rain on someone else’s success, particularly if that someone is a businessman who could actually win the presidency on November 8. Moreover, those protestors that actually showed up were clearly bought and paid for by George Soros’ lavishly funded left-wing website, MoveOn.org as well as the usual union suspects.
As it turns out, only a handful of these operatives showed up at the Trump International today. Worse, they generally didn’t look to “angry” either, likely happy to get a paid day off just to carry a few clichéd signs around while Trump’s guests and, of course, the press were inside enjoying and/or covering the event.
Reporters inside—also known as Clinton Operatives with Bylines—more or less covered the event, but did so with predictable snarkiness. Washington’s all-news radio station, WTOP-FM weighed in with this short online report:
“Donald Trump said he appeared at the grand opening ceremony of his new Washington hotel ‘to be there’ for his family — and will resume campaigning right afterward. The Republican presidential nominee received criticism for taking hours out of his campaign schedule Wednesday to attend the opening, which comes less than two weeks before Election Day.”
Note the phrase “received criticism,” so often casually employed in the media when opining on a candidate not to their liking. We never learn where the “criticism” actually comes from in cases like this one, meaning that “criticism” is either entirely fiction or, just as likely, the latest snarky remark from some obscure opposition party lackey.
In case you didn’t get the drift, WUSA-TV9 “reporter” Garrett Haake clarifies matters for us in a Facebook entry:
“Let’s dispel with this fiction that [email protected] ribbon cutting is not a campaign event. ‘Today is a metaphor for what we can accomplish.’”
Who said it wasn’t a campaign event? No citation here, of course. Bad grammar, too, in Haake’s opening exhortation.
In truth, Donald Trump couldn’t have chosen a better campaign mini-event than this one, demonstrating his business success and ability to improve a once-blighted landmark on Washington’s most famous avenue? With two weeks remaining in Campaign 2016, Trump’s success in this endeavor is a bright and shining metaphor for the different kind of “hope and change” his campaign is promising should he be elected president in November.Click here for reuse options!
Copyright 2016 Communities Digital News
• The views expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of the editors or management of Communities Digital News.
This article is the copyrighted property of the writer and Communities Digital News, LLC. Written permission must be obtained before reprint in online or print media. REPRINTING CONTENT WITHOUT PERMISSION AND/OR PAYMENT IS THEFT AND PUNISHABLE BY LAW.
Correspondingly, Communities Digital News, LLC uses its best efforts to operate in accordance with the Fair Use Doctrine under US Copyright Law and always tries to provide proper attribution. If you have reason to believe that any written material or image has been innocently infringed, please bring it to the immediate attention of CDN via the e-mail address or phone number listed on the Contact page so that it can be resolved expeditiously.